I’ve read a couple of books based on the 1912 Daddy Long Legs by Jean Webster (Dear Mr. Knightly by Katherine Reay and Sincerely, Jem by Kate Willis in A Very Bookish Christmas). But I had never read the original story. I figured it was time to remedy that.
Jerusha Abbott,, who calls herself Judy, has grown up in the John Grier Home orphanage. She has just about aged out of the system. She’s finished high school and is working at the home.
Then she receives word that one of the trustees has offered to pay her way through college. One of Judy’s teachers had told him she could be an excellent writer. The trustee will pay all of Judy’s expenses and give her an allowance. The donor does not want Judy to know who he is. He’ll communicate through his secretary. His only requirement is that she write him a letter once a month about what she’s learning.
The rest of the book is made up of Judy’s letters. She was told to address her letters to Mr. John Smith. She had caught a glimpse of him from behind during one of the trustees’ monthly meetings to the orphanage. She could only make out that he was very tall, so she nicknames him Daddy Long Legs.
Although thoroughly excited by her opportunity, Judy faces challenges as well. An East Coast girl’s college is a different environment from an orphanage. Judy faces a social learning curve as well as an academic one.
But for the most part she faces life optimistically. Her letters are usually lively and cheerful. But sometimes she’s downhearted or angry—sometimes with Daddy Long Legs.
Since I’d read other books based on this story, I knew the surprise twist near the end of who “Daddy” was. But it was still satisfying to see how it came about and to see little clues appear.
The original books contained some drawings by the author (Judy refers to them in her letters). But, unfortunately, the free Kindle version didn’t have them.
One thing that irked me, though, was that Judy seemed to feel obligated to make several “digs” at religion. Yes, this is a secular book, and so I don’t expect it to portray Christian values. But I don’t expect it to poke at them, either. What religious instruction Judy had at the orphanage seemed institutional and cheerless (she says of one dinner with new friends, ““We don’t have to say grace beforehand. It’s a relief not having to thank Somebody for every mouthful you eat. [I dare say I’m blasphemous; but you’d be, too, if you’d offered as much obligatory thanks as I have.”]) Maybe that’s what she’s rebelling against. But I couldn’t help wonder if some of these thoughts were the author’s and this was her way to get them out into the world. One thing Judy shares from her vast amounts of reading in college was that “I didn’t know that people used to be monkeys and that the Garden of Eden was a beautiful myth.” Maybe that’s what starts her on a negative religious path; maybe it was there before and this new “learning” brought it to the forefront. Elsewhere she says, “Thank heaven I don’t inherit God from anybody! I am free to make mine up as I wish Him. He’s kind and sympathetic and imaginative and forgiving and understanding—and He has a sense of humour.”
A couple of quotes I enjoyed:
It isn’t the big troubles in life that require character. Anybody can rise to a crisis and face a crushing tragedy with courage, but to meet the petty hazards of the day with a laugh—I really think that requires SPIRIT.
Most people don’t live; they just race. They are trying to reach some goal far away on the horizon, and in the heat of the going they get so breathless and panting that they lose all sight of the beautiful, tranquil country they are passing through; and then the first thing they know, they are old and worn out, and it doesn’t make any difference whether they’ve reached the goal or not.
Normally epistolary novels aren’t my favorite, but this was a pleasant read. The author has a nice style. Someday soon I hope to get to the sequel, Dear Enemy, focusing on one of Judy’s roommates.
I am counting this book as my classic by a new-to-me author for the Back to the Classics Challenge.
(Sharing with Carole’s Books You Loved)
Interesting; new book and author to me as well. Sounds like she is about the same era as Hoosier author Gene Stratton Porter, whose work I enjoy. Yeah, the digs at religion seem a little out of place for the era. Hmmmm.
Barb, I enjoyed reading your review of this book. I’ve never heard of this title or its author. I really enjoyed Dear Mr. Knightley. I was disappointed to read of the religious digs, but these sentiments are ages old, so I guess we shouldn’t be too surprised when they show up in writings from different eras.
Pingback: January Reflections | Stray Thoughts
I really enjoyed this book, but those parts were she was making digs at Christianity bothered me too. I loved Dear Mr. Knightley (which is how I first heard of Daddy Long Legs). I just finished my first book for the Back to Classics challenge, The Blue Castle. I absolutely LOVED it, but there were some subtly digs at church (not directly at God). It was mainly because the main character grew up in a very strict upbringing and Christianity/church were misinterpreted by her strict family, but still, it made me wince a bit.
I think LMM had some mixed views about religion. When I read biographies of her, I came away thinking she was probably not a Christian in the sense of being born again. I think her upbringing, like her character’s, had a lot to do with turning her away from Biblical religion. I read Blue Castle several years ago and found it a little hard to get into at first, but then enjoyed it more later on.
Oh–and I really enjoyed Dear Mr. Knightley. That may have been the first book where I became aware of Daddy Long Legs.
I’ve read Daddy Longlegs a long long time ago, in my teens. I’ve read it several times, it’s a great book.
Pingback: Back to the Classics Challenge Wrap-Up | Stray Thoughts
Pingback: Books Read in 2021 | Stray Thoughts