I had no interest in reading Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy for years. I knew it was about a woman who committed adultery, and I figured it would be pretty soap-opera-ish and probably a bit racy.
But Tolstoy did not seem given to raciness in any of his other books that I’d read. Then Carol’s review made me think perhaps there might be more to the story than I’d thought. So I decided to give it a try for my Classic in Translation choice for the Back to the Classics challenge.
The novel has one of literature’s most famous opening lines: “All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.”
Anna doesn’t actually show up until several chapters in. The book opens with her brother, Stepan (also called by his nickname, Stiva, or his last name, Oblonsky, or his full name. All the characters have three polysyllabic Russian names plus nicknames, so it’s a little hard to sort them out at first. But once we get to know them, it’s easier.) Stiva has cheated on his wife, Dolly, who has found out. Stiva doesn’t think adultery is wrong and doesn’t see himself at fault, but he’s sorry he has hurt Dolly. His sister, Anna, is on her way to try to reconcile her brother and his wife.
Anna is described as beautiful, bright, charming, and eager. She doesn’t gloss over Stiva’s behavior, but she asks Dolly is she loves him enough to forgive him. Dolly had been contemplating leaving, but decides to forgive Stiva and stay.
Dolly’s sister, Kitty, has two suitors. Levin is the better man, but he’s socially awkward and lives in the country (and the society people can’t fathom what on earth one does in the country. Later, visitors seem to view time in the country as a holiday, while Levin works almost nonstop.) Count Vronsky is handsome, dashing, well-off, and in the highest society, so Kitty is swept away with him and refuses Levin’s proposal.
But Vronsky has no desire to marry, ever. He has enjoyed Kitty’s affections, but he’s had a string of romantic attachments, thinks marriage and husbands are stupid, and has no plans to settle down—until he meets Anna.
They meet at the train when Vronsky’s mother is coming in on the same train with Anna when she comes to see Stiva and Dolly. Anna and Vronsky are instantly attracted to each other, so much so that at a ball when they dance, Kitty knows Vronsky is lost to her.
Anna resists the attraction at first. Her situation is almost an anatomy of falling into temptation. She was not truly happy in her marriage, but as far as we know, she wasn’t entertaining thoughts of adultery until she met Vronsky. She’s disturbed by the strange attraction and knows it’s not right. When she gets home, some of the sheen is rubbed of the joy she had anticipated in getting back to her son, and all her husband’s faults stand out. Vronsky follows her. She has three groups of friends, and instead of avoiding Vronsky (“making no provision for the flesh“), she hangs out with the group he’s likely to be part of. Eventually, she succumbs. Though she’s ashamed and guilty, she continues to the point of leaving her family to be with Vronsky. Gradually her heart and conscience harden, but her thinking and personality become unstable.
Despite the lack of morals in her set of friends (almost everyone in the society group has an affair going or someone knowingly kept on the side), Anna is an outcast. One source said it was because her affair was out in the open while others kept theirs hidden. There’s also some inequity in that Vronsky can go out in society, but Anna is snubbed.
There are several major characters, but Levin’s story takes up as much of the novel as Anna’s—maybe more. His story runs in the opposite trajectory. He’s said to be based on some extent on Tolstoy. He had faith as a child, but lost it in college and now does not acknowledge himself to be a believer. He’s a landowner and tries to do his best by the people who work for him and who are dependent on him. But he gets frustrated when the peasants won’t agree to new methods or equipment. Though he thinks deeply, he gets lost in the intellectual arguments of his brothers and others. He eventually marries, but doesn’t find home life the bliss he thought it would be. He and his wife argue a lot. But they talk things out and work through them. His lack of faith begins to bother him after his brother dies, and his spiritual journey is a major part of the book. As Anna moves away from stability and happiness, Levin moves toward them.
There are so many layers in this book, it’s hard to sort through what to share. There are multiple discussions about marriage and family, society and city life vs. rural life, affected, hypocritical religion vs. true change of heart, the politics of the day.
Tolstoy does a masterful job painting his characters and helping us understand them. There are so many interesting little insights into people’s motivations and actions. For instance, Anna’s husband, Karenin, is a public official known for Christian values. Yet he fails to do the most Christian thing required of a husband: love his wife as Christ loved the church. His first notice that something is wrong is when Anna is not as attentive to him as she used to be. He only asks that she not bring Vronsky to the house and that she maintain decorum. He may think that he’s being magnanimous by yielding to her desires, but he shows he only cares about appearances. Early on, Anna says things like, “If only he’d fight for me.” His most profound religious moment comes at a crisis when he realizes he needs to forgive her. Yet even then he struggles between what he feels led to do and the “force” that drives him, the opinion of society.
One source I consulted said Anna is a pioneer feminist fulfilling her self-determination. But I don’t think Tolstoy writes her that way. He’s not saying, “Poor girl, society is being so mean to you for making your own choices.” Though he points out the foibles and hypocrisies of society, he portrays Anna as genuinely wrong and self-destructing because of it.
For all the free-thinking society talk of immorality, thankfully there are no sex scenes, and nothing explicit is said or shown.
I’ll warn you that if you look for information about this book, Anna’s end is spoiled rather ruthlessly. That was frustrating to me because I had no idea how she ended and hated finding out when I had barely started the book. After that I tried to steer clear of looking at other sources until I finished reading the book.
I primarily listened to the audiobook nicely read by Maggie Gyllenhaal, but I also read parts of the Kindle version. I wish I had known earlier that the Kindle version translated the frequent French phrases. I lost a bit in the audio by not knowing what was said in those moments. But Maggie brought a lot of emotion and thoughtfulness to the narrative, so I am glad I experienced that.
I’ve seen in several places that Anna Karenina is a major contender for best novel ever written. I don’t think I’d put it on that level. But it’s a rich book that gives one much to ponder.
(Sharing with Carole’s Books You Loved, Booknificent Thursday)
Pingback: Reading Plans for 2019 | Stray Thoughts
I finally read this book a couple years ago too and was surprised that I enjoyed it as much as I did. I wouldn’t say either that it’s the best book ever, but it was worth my time reading it. Thankfully I hadn’t heard about the ending; what a bummer that it got spoiled for you. I often won’t even read the back covers of novels because I don’t want any clues about what’s going to happen. 🙂
I try to be careful how much I read before or during a book, too. I’d rather let the story unfold as written.
What an insightful review, Barbara!
What a terrific review, Barbara. I appreciate your detailing the various story lines as well as Tolstoy’s skill in weaving the story together.
Thank you! I always struggle with telling too much in a review. But AK is so massive, there’s plenty left that I didn’t talk about. 🙂
This novel is a classic!!! It is DEFINITELY considered one of the best books ever written! Maybe because i studied it in my junior year of high school advanced English …..i read it on my own the summer before i was 17 and loved it! Both of my daughters have enjoyed it in their HOnors English class as well. Claire has even read parts of it in Russian 😀
Glad you finally experienced it.
I’m glad you all enjoyed it! There are other books I enjoyed more than this, but it was definitely good.
Well, I do know the ending since I watched the movie with Daughter #1 — she read the book and wanted to see it; based on the length of the book I wasn’t sure I’d ever tackle it. But reading your thoughts on it — maybe!
I’ve thought about seeing one of the films based on the book. I’ve been afraid they’d play up or show too much of the sexual encounters. Tolstoy wrote marvelously about getting explicit at all.
Pingback: End-of-September Musings | Stray Thoughts
I was introduced to Anna in high school and fell in love with the book. Then I re-read it in the year of my second pregnancy along with some Doestoevsky and it was perfect once again.
Your thoughts were so much fun to read.
Beautiful cover too!
I love this book! You’re right, you can really see her temptation and attraction without it being too racy. (I love romantic stories but usually sex scenes make me feel awkward.) I think it’s so interesting how men have no repercussions for cheating, even pretty openly, but women do, and I felt to badly for Anna. It’s been a few year since I last read this, maybe I should read it again.
Pingback: Books Read in 2019 | Stray Thoughts
Pingback: Back to the Classics Challenge Wrap-up 2019 | Stray Thoughts