“The Discipline of Watching”

“The Discipline of Watching” is the 12th chapter in the book The Discipline of Grace by Jerry Bridges, which we’re discussing every Thursday in the “Reading Classics Together” challenge at Challies‘ place. More discussion on this chapter is here.

The epigraph for this chapter is Matthew 26:41: “Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation. The spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.” Just as the Titanic sank because its captain and crew ignored warnings and didn’t employ methods at hand for watching out for icebergs, so we can fall into temptation if we’re not watchful and if we don’t employ the tools God gave us for that purpose.

The first step in watchfulness is knowing our enemies: the world, the flesh, and the devil. Each has unique ways of attempting to lure one into sin.

Probably most of us have the most trouble with the “flesh,” our old nature. Bridges quotes Sinclair Ferguson as saying, “Freedom from the dominion of sin is not…the same thing as freedom from its presence and influence. Indeed, the power of sin remains where the dominion has been banished, and though that power of sin be weakened, yet its nature is not changed” (p. 212). We’re saved from the dominion of sin when we become Christians, but we won’t be totally free from its presence until we get to heaven, so we must be on guard against its influence and pulls. “Our flesh is always searching out opportunities to gratify itself according to the particular sinful desires each of us has” (p. 213-214). Though we can be tempted by most anything, each of us has certain sins we’re more inclined to. Jim Berg, in his book Changed Into His Image, calls them “designer sins.”

We need to know our particular weaknesses in order to watch out for our particular temptations. But we need to be careful of our strengths, too, “because that is where we are apt to trust ourselves and not depend on God” (p. 217). We need to be careful not to let “little” sins slide, because they can snowball into bigger problems before we know it.

All this talk of watchfulness might cause some to wonder, “What about Christian liberty?” Paul urges us not to”turn our freedom into an opportunity for the flesh” (Galatians 5:13). We can’t make up a Pharisaical list of don’ts (we can too easily judge our spirituality and everyone else’s by our “lists”), but we need to know that our heart is desperately wicked and will look for excuses to follow its own way. Some helpful guidelines to keep ourselves in check are:

“All things are lawful for me,” but not all things are helpful. “All things are lawful for me,” but I will not be enslaved by anything.  I Corinthians 6:12.

All things are lawful, but not all things are profitable. All things are lawful, but not all things edify. Let no one seek his own good, but that of his neighbor. (I Corinthians 10:23-24).

“The best defense is a good offense,” as the old saying goes, and “the best offense is meditation on the Word of God and prayer. It is surely no coincidence that they are the only two spiritual exercises that we are encouraged to do continually” (p. 223). “For every temptation that you face, there are specific passages of Scripture that address that issue” (p. 223). We can seek some out, perhaps asking the help of another mature Christian if we don’t know where to look, and then “memorize those verses, meditate on them, and pray over them every day, asking the Holy Spirit to bring them to your mind in times of need. Ask, also, that He will strengthen your will to enable you to obey the word that He brings to your mind” (p. 223). And we can pray, as Jesus instructed His disciples, that God would “lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one” (Matthew 6:13).

Even with all of that, we sin every day, and we need God’s grace for forgiveness. “The gospel of God’s forgiveness of our sins through Christ’s death frees us to face those sins honestly and bring them to the cross and Jesus’ cleansing blood. The freedom and joy that then come from a cleansed conscience create the desire and give us the right motive to deal with those sins. We cannot effectively pursue holiness without going back again and again to the gospel” (p. 225).

And even though Bridges doesn’t say this directly, it’s implied through the whole chapter that grace doesn’t negate the need for watchfulness. That we can be forgiven for sins doesn’t mean we should not make every attempt to avoid them. Jesus said to “watch and pray” and to pray that we wouldn’t be led into temptation, Paul told readers to “flee youthful lusts,” to do and not to do certain things. We can’t be presumptuous and negligent, thinking that it doesn’t matter if we sin because God will forgive us. Psalm 19:13 even contains the prayer, “Keep back thy servant also from presumptuous sins; let them not have dominion over me.” But, thank God, when we do fail we can experience His grace and forgiveness.

What’s On Your Nightstand: October 2012

What's On Your NightstandThe folks at 5 Minutes For Books host What’s On Your Nightstand? the fourth Tuesday of each month in which we can share about the books we have been reading and/or plan to read.

Here is what I’ve finished since last time:

Full Disclosure by Dee Henderson, reviewed here. Liked it a lot.

When You Come Home: The True Love Story Of A Soldier’s Heroism, His Wife’s Sacrifice and the Resilience of America’s Greatest Generation by Nancy Pitts, not reviewed. This story had been featured in Tom Brokaw’s Greatest Generation, and this is the full story.

Audiobooks of C. S. Lewis’s Space Trilogy: Out of the Silent Plant, Perelandra, and just finished That Hideous Strength yesterday afternoon.  I’m planning to review them all together  — unless that ends up being too long a post.

I had finished A Wrinkle in Time last time but hadn’t reviewed it yet: that review is here if anyone is interested. I’d appreciate the input of anyone who has read more of her than I have: I’m still not quite sure what to think of her.

I’m currently reading:

The Disciplines of Grace by Jerry Bridges with Challies‘ “Reading Classics Together” group. Only two chapters left!

Unless It Moves the Human Heart: The Craft and Art of Writing by Roger Rosenblatt (ought to move this one to TBR since I haven’t progressed much past the first few pages)

Thriving at College: Make Great Friends, Keep Your Faith, and Get Ready for the Real World! by Alex Chediak. Almost done! This one has been on here a while.

Uncle Tom’s Cabin for Carrie‘s Book Club October pick

Wildflowers of Terezin by Robert Elmer

Up next:

The Christian Imagination by Leland Ryken

The Last Superhero by Stephen Altrogge. I’ve never read anything by Altrogge, but it was free for the Kindle app, so a good time to try it, yes?

Allerednic: A Regency Cinderella Tale–In Reverse by Chautona Havig, another free one (great way to try new authors!) And my friend Lou Ann liked this, which bodes well for it.

Next audiobook: Probably The Hobbit. I want to go through it before the film comes out in December.

Happy Reading!

“The Discipline of Choices”

“The Discipline of Choices” is the 11th chapter in the book The Discipline of Grace by Jerry Bridges, which we’re discussing every Thursday in the “Reading Classics Together” challenge at Challies‘ place. More discussion on this chapter is here.

This was a hard chapter for me. Not hard to understand so much, but hard to come to grips with. As “spiritual” as it sounds to want to fight sin by “giving it all to God” or asking Him to take it, what it comes down to is my choice. I can’t make the right choices without Him, but I have to yield either to righteousness or unrighteousness. But it was also a helpful and hopeful chapter.

I’m not going to outline or summarize the chapter this time, but I will just share a few key points that stood out to me:

“We obey one choice at a time” (p. 191). That was a major relief to me. Looking at a lifetime of fighting sinful tendencies sounds exhausting, but I only have to focus on one choice at a time.

Whichever way we yield ourselves, we’re training and developing our character either further in righteousness or further in sin.

We might agree with what the Bible says about a certain sin, “and even make a commitment of sorts to put it out of our lives…..We would like to be rid of that sin, and even pray to God to take it away, but are we willing to say no to it?” (p. 194).

Most of us have at least a couple of areas we struggle with, have made commitments about, memorized applicable verses about. “We need to be especially vigilant in these areas to make the right choices. We have already made too many wrong choices; that is why these sin patterns are so deeply entrenched in us. It is only through making the right choice to obey God’s Word that we will break the habits of sin and develop the habits of holiness. This is where we desperately need the power of the Holy Spirit to enable us to make the right choices. So cry out to God every day for His help that day, and then cry out again each time you are confronted with the choice to sin or to obey” (p. 194).

There were several standout statements about “mortification” from Romans 8:13: “For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.”

“Mortification, or putting sin to death, is our responsibility. Paul said, ‘You put sin to death’ (emphasis added). This is something we must do. It is not something we turn over to God. Rather, it is our responsibility, as Paul also emphasized in Colossians 3:5” (p. 196).

“Although mortification is our responsibility, it can only be done through the enabling power of the Holy Spirit. Paul said, ‘But if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will live’ (emphasis added)” (p. 196).

“To mortify a sin means to subdue it, to deprive it of its power, to break the habit pattern we have developed of continually giving in to the temptation of that particular sin. The goal of mortification is to weaken the habits of sin so that we do make the right choices” (p. 197).

“To mortify sin we must focus on its true nature. So often we are troubled with a persistent sin only because it disturbs our peace and makes us feel guilty. We need to focus on it as an act of rebellion against God” (p. 198).

After explaining that the word for “mortify” is used several times in the NT of putting someone to death in the context of hostility (as when Jesus was put to death), Bridges says, “Now apply that sense of hostility toward the sin you wish to mortify. See it for what it is and what it stands for — a rebellion against God, a breaking of His law, a despising of His authority, a grieving of His heart. This is where mortification actually begins, with a right attitude toward sin. It begins with the realization that sin is wrong, not because of what it does to me, or my spouse, or child, or neighbor, but because it is an act of rebellion against the infinitely holy and majestic God who sent His Son to be the propitiation for my sins” (p. 199).

“Think of an unusually persistent sin in your life…You say you cannot overcome it. Why not? Is it because you exalt your secret desire above the will of God?” (p. 199).

Just as in past chapters Bridges has emphasized that the pursuit of holiness is not just against sin but towards Christ-likeness, so he applies that truth here as well. Our choices are not just to avoid certain temptations but to grow in holiness.

“Just as it is ‘by the Spirit’ that we put to death the misdeeds of the body, so it is by the Spirit that we put on the virtues of Christlike character. That is why Paul could say in Colossians 3:12-14 that we are to clothe ourselves with these qualities (emphasizing our responsibility), while in Galatians 5:22-23 he refers to Christian character traits as the ‘fruit of the Spirit’ (emphasizing our dependence on the Spirit). The same Spirit who enables us to mortify sin also enables us to put on godly character” (p. 203).

“There is a fine line between using grace as an excuse for sin and using grace as a remedy for our sin,” but we do need to understand that we will often fail, especially when fighting long-held and deeply engrained habits, and to remember “that we stand before God on the basis of His grace rather than our performance.” (p. 204).

“The solution to staying on the right side of the fine line between using and abusing grace is repentance. The road to repentance is godly sorrow (2 Corinthians 7:10). Godly sorrow is developed when we focus on the true nature of sin as an offense against God rather than something that makes us feel guilty….Dwelling on the true nature of sin leads us to godly sorrow, which in turn leads us to repentance” (p. 205).

Book Review: Full Disclosure

Some years back, my mom’s Christianity was uncertain but she didn’t want to talk about it. But I discovered she would read Christian fiction, so I sought to find the kinds of stories she would like. I wasn’t into action/suspense/mystery books so much, but she liked them. so I looked for that kind of book within Christian fiction, and that’s how I found Dee Henderson. Though I started reading them to pass on to my mom, I quickly became enthralled myself, and devoured all of the O’Malley series as well as the Uncommon Heroes series.

Dee hasn’t had anything new out for 5 or 6 years, so when I saw that  Full Disclosure was due out, I quickly preordered it. And I think she has another winner here.

FBI Special Agent Paul Falconer has been on the trail of one case for years: a lady shooter responsible for thirty murders. One day Ann Silver, the Midwest Homicide Investigator, shows up in his office unexpectedly with a lead on the case.

Though the two are mutually attracted, this isn’t a typical romance. Ann is content to be single, not looking to be married, and isn’t sure whether her past or her secrets would allow for marriage. Since Paul is an investigator, he seeks information about Ann before approaching her directly. He is in line to become the head of the Falcon family and its extensive businesses and industries, and his responsibilities, their different locations, activities, job stresses, and personalities, all make a relationship questionable, but he is ready to try. Now he just has to convince Ann, and she has to decide whether she can fully disclose her secrets to him.

Meanwhile there is unexpected and surprising progress on the lady shooter case as well as unexpected development in a case Ann is writing a book about.

I love the several layers to the title, Full Disclosure: one aspect involves Ann, and both cases are progressively disclosed as well. I liked that this was an older person’s thoughtful romance without silly swooning. I liked the realistic way they had to come to terms with their differences, both having to adjust, and the way their Christianity was natural and impacted everything they did. And there is quite a big “Wow, I didn’t see that coming” moment near the end of the book. I think I may have gasped out loud when I came to it.

It has been a long time since I read Dee’s other books, so it took me a while to recognize that some of her other characters are here as well, but it was fun to do so. Small spoiler here: one unexpected twist is that Ann is portrayed as the writer of the O’Malley and Uncommon Heroes books. I wasn’t sure how I felt about that at first, but it was kind of neat to have the stories within a story. And the fact that Ann wrote books based on her friends’ lives but keeps a low profile herself, and the fact that Dee seems to keep a low profile as well has me hmmming, wondering if Ann really “is” Dee or if the similarities are just for fun.

There is an interview with Dee here. I give Full Disclosure two thumbs up and five stars.

The Discipline of Convictions

Contrary to the postmodern belief that there is no absolute truth, the Bible discloses much absolute truth, and it is incumbent upon believers to know it both so that we worship God “in spirit and in truth,” and so that our behavior reflects our beliefs. Otherwise our morality is determined by consensus, by what everyone else is doing. Even Christians fall too easily into that trap, of adapting their lives to their particular Christian culture rather than on Bible-based convictions.

Jerry Bridges, in The Discipline of Grace, defines conviction as “a determinative belief: something you believe so strongly that it affects the way you live. Someone has observed that a belief is what you hold, but a conviction is what holds you” (p. 167).

God tells us “do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God” (Romans 12:2). Renewing our minds comes about as we read God’s Word, delight in it, meditate on it, and thereby derive convictions from it. “One who delights in the Law of God sees the Bible not just as a book of rules that are difficult to live by, but as the Word of his or her heavenly Father who is the God of all grace and deals with him or her in grace” (p. 169).

Without regular time reading and studying the Bible, our beliefs and morality will be influenced by the ungodly. Psalm 1 contrasts the righteous with the ungodly.

If we do not actively seek to come under the influence of God’s Word, we will come under the influence of sinful society around us. The impact of our culture with its heavy emphasis on materialism, living for one’s self, and instant gratification is simply too strong and pervasive for us not to be influenced by it. Once again, there is no such thing as a neutral stance on the continuum of influence. We are being drawn more and more under the transforming influence of Scripture, or we are being progressively drawn into the web of an ungodly society around us (p. 171).

But as we approach the Scriptures, we need to do so with the conviction that it is the Word of God, asking God to teach us its truths rather than just looking to shore up our own opinions, and we need to seek to apply it to our lives, not just store up knowledge and facts.

Our acceptance by God the Father is based solely on His grace to us through Christ. His favor is never earned by what we do nor forfeited by what we don’t do. But we may say with equal emphasis that our progress in the pursuit of holiness is to a significant degree conditioned on our use of the disciplines that God has appointed for us (p. 184).

Bridges mostly discusses how developing Bible-based convictions will keep us from veering off into ungodly thoughts and behaviors, but it will also help us not to veer into Christian lines of thought that are off-base or off-balance. Sometimes Christians can get hold of one aspect of truth without its balance of another, or take a Bible-based conviction and extrapolate from that certain standards of behavior that aren’t Biblically based at all, and defend those convictions with as much or more vigor than the clear teaching of Scripture. That can do great harm to the cause of Christ and the testimonies of believers. We desperately need to form convictions based on Scripture itself.

“The Discipline of Commitment” is the 10th chapter in the book The Discipline of Grace by Jerry Bridges, which we’re discussing every Thursday in the “Reading Classics Together” challenge at Challies‘ place. More discussion on this chapter is here.

“The Discipline of Commitment”

After I first became a Christian, when I would become convicted of some sin, I’d make a commitment never to do that again…and of course, fall flat on my face. So I began to think making a commitment was not the way to go about it and was, in fact, setting oneself up for failure. And since it is better not to make a vow than to vow and not fulfill it, I began to just pray that the Lord would help me not to do that particular thing.

But Jerry Bridges makes a compelling argument for making commitments against sin in the chapter “The Discipline of Commitment” in his book The Discipline of Grace. For one thing, in Scripture we see people like Job (“I made a covenant with mine eyes; why then should I think upon a maid?” Job 31:1) and Daniel (“But Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king’s meat, nor with the wine which he drank” Daniel 1:8) do so.

But before we get into making specific commitments against specific sins, we’re called to commit ourselves totally to the Lord. Romans 12:1 says, “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.” Bridges says, “When we commit ourselves to the pursuit of holiness, we need to ensure that our commitment is actually to God, not simply to a holy lifestyle or a set of moral values” (p. 148).

Also, “We should not seek holiness in order to feel good about ourselves, or to blend in with our Christian peer group, or to avoid the sense of shame and guilt that follows the committing of persistent sin in our lives. Far too often our concern with sin arises from how it makes us feel” (p. 149). And we need to guard against being “more vexed at the lowering of our self-esteem than we are grieved at God’s dishonor” (p. 149).

Plus, our commitment should not but just to avoid sin, but to pursue Christlike virtues. Colossians 3:12 says, “Put on therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering.”

Psalm 119:106 says, “I have sworn, and I will perform it, that I will keep thy righteous judgments.” Bridges quotes Stephen Charnock as saying, “Frequently renew settled and holy resolutions. A soldier unresolved to fight may easily be defeated” (p. 151). “If you do not commit yourself to the pursuit of holiness in these specific areas of your life, you will find a tendency to vacillate in the face of these temptations” (p. 159).

Perhaps the hardest thing for me in this chapter was Bridges’ consistent urge to allow no exceptions. “If we do not make such a commitment to obedience without exception, we will find ourselves constantly making exceptions” (p. 153).

But how can we do such a thing? Bridges says one way is by intention. “Is it our intention to please God in all our actions?” (p. 152). He quotes William Law as saying that our lack of holiness often is due to a lack of intention. Law goes on to say, “This doctrine does not suppose that we have no need of divine grace, or that it is in our own power to make ourselves perfect. It only supposes that through the [lack] of a sincere intention of pleasing God in all our actions, we fall into such irregularities of life, as by the ordinary means of grace, we should have power to avoid” (p. 153). Or as I saw quoted somewhere else recently, “Drift is almost always away.” When we don’t have a daily intent to please God in everything, we’re going to find ourselves allowing those things that don’t please Him.

What about grace? Doesn’t this all sound a little legalistic?

“Is God really this strict?” Yes…because he cannot compromise His holiness the least bit. His goal is to conform us to the likeness of His Son, and Jesus was completely without sin, though He was tempted every way we are (Hebrews 4:15). No, we cannot, or perhaps will not, keep these commitments perfectly, but keeping them perfectly should at least be our aim. In a battle, some soldiers will always be hit, but every one of them makes it his aim not to be hit. To have a lesser aim would be the height of folly. (p. 160).

“It was in view of God’s mercy that Paul urged the Romans, and us today, to commit our bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God” (p. 160). Paul had spent the preceding 11 chapters of Romans detailing God’s grace in the gospel. Bridges has several paragraphs, too long to repeat here, bringing out some of the truths of grace from the first part of Romans.

“It is this mercy that is reveled to us in the gospel and that we believers have experienced that is the ground for our commitment. Such a commitment as Paul called for would indeed be a legalistic and oppressive commitment if it were not grounded in love. And the only way Paul would stir up our love is to remind us of God’s love for us, revealed through His mercy and grace. What Paul asked for from us is only a response of love and gratitude, which expresses itself in loving commitment (p. 161).

God provides the grace for the commitment He calls us to (Romans 6:11-14, Hebrews 4:15-16). We need to remind ourselves of the gospel frequently not just to cleanse our consciences, but to reaffirm our commitment to Him as a response of love and gratitude (p. 162-163).

On a personal note…in the course of reading this chapter, I became convicted of a bad driving habit. You wouldn’t think to look at me that I’d be guilty of “road rage,” and as a general rule I am not an angry driver, but when other drivers do something particularly dumb that impacts me, I can get pretty hot under the collar. Just recently I had been stuck behind not one but two different pokey drivers on roads where I couldn’t pass, and I was in danger of being late for church, so when the second one finally turned off the road, I gunned the engine and veered around him before he was totally turned. Then I noticed a car behind me, and hoped it wasn’t someone from church…but it was (and interestingly, after this incident, Bridges shared a very similar one, driving the conviction even deeper.) I always feel guilty about these incidents and think, “I really shouldn’t react that way.” But while reading this chapter I began to feel that I should go further than that. I made a commitment that, God helping me, I would not react in anger while driving for several reasons: It’s dangerous (I could hit someone else while angrily reacting), it is a poor testimony to the driver I’m reacting to as well as anyone watching, and it is not demonstrating the self-control that is a fruit of the Holy Spirit. And, of course, I’ve been tested on this about 3 times since then…but God has used the commitment, or intention, to remind me and help me not to respond in a fleshly way. Bridges urges us to make a general commitment as well as commitments in specific areas….I think if I did that I’d have a very long list to work on, but this is a start.

“The Discipline of Commitment” is the 9th chapter in the book The Discipline of Grace by Jerry Bridges, which we’re discussing every Thursday in the “Reading Classics Together” challenge at Challies‘ place. More discussion on this chapter is here. I had to miss Thursday, but wanted to go through the chapter anyway for my own edification.

Preview of Uncle Tom’s Cabin

Reading to Know - Book Club
I’ve mentioned a number of times that I am hosting Carrie’s “Reading to Know” Book Club for the month of October, and my book choice is Uncle Tom’s Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe. I shared some introductory remarks about the book here at Carrie‘s.

I’d love to have you join us! If you do so, please drop over to Carrie‘s and let her know in this post. It’s not required that one write a review of the book, but Carrie will provide a place to share thoughts about the book and link up to reviews if you’ve written them on October 26.

“Dependent Discipline”

“Dependent Discipline” is the 8th chapter in the book The Discipline of Grace by Jerry Bridges, which we’re discussing every Thursday in the “Reading Classics Together” challenge at Challies‘ place.

Bridges likens dependence and discipline to the two different wings of an airplane, both of which are needed to fly. By discipline here he means not God’s discipline of us, which he discussed in chapter 5, but rather “certain activities designed to train a person in a particular skill”as when Paul told Timothy “to train himself, or discipline himself, to be godly (I Timothy 4:7)” (p. 130).

Now we will be looking at the discipline of ourselves, the responsibilities we must shoulder to pursue holiness. But the point of the airplane illustration is that we must not carry out our responsibilities in our own strength and willpower. We must depend upon the Holy Spirit to enable us. At the same time we must not assume that we have no responsibilities simply because we are dependent. God enables us to work, but He does not do the work for us (p. 130).

Bridges then discusses several Scriptural examples of dependence coupled with work, such as Psalm 127:1, Nehemiah’s rebuilding of the city wall (especially 4:8-9), and Paul’s testimony in Philippians 4:11-13 and Colossians 1:28-29. In that last reference, Paul says he labored, striving (or struggling, depending on the translation), using “a strong [Greek] word, denoting toil to the point of weariness or exhaustion,” the word “agonizomai, from which we get our word agonize, and conveys the idea of an athlete straining to win the race” (p. 133). But he labored “according to his working, which worketh in me mightily,” not in his own strength.

Balance comes up so often in the Bible, and balance is needed here as well. People tend to err by leaning too far one way or the other. In this instance, many advocate the passive approach of “letting Christ live His life through me.” I’ve known some very good people whom I greatly respect who advocate this view, and it never set right with me, because of its passivity as opposed to the action verbs in the gospels and New Testament. Bridges clarified the problems with this approach for me. “He does not live His life through me. Rather, as I depend on Him, He enables me to live a life pleasing to Him” (p. 134). “God’s work does not make our effort unnecessary, but rather makes it effective. Paul did not say, ‘Christ shows contentment through me.’ Rather, he said, ‘I have learned to be content through Him who gives me strength'”(p. 134-135).

The other end of the off-balance spectrum is relying on our spiritual disciplines, necessary as they are, as the source of our spiritual strength rather than on Christ’s strength applied in our lives by the Holy Spirit.

There were times in Old Testament battles when God miraculously gave a victory without Israel having to fight or provided food without any effort of the people involved. But more often than not, He worked through the people going to battle and planting and watering and toiling.

As I Corinthians 3:7 says, planting and watering is needed, but God gives the increase. “The truth is, we must plant and we must water if we are to make progress in holiness, but only the Holy Spirit can change us more and more into the likeness of Jesus. Our problem is that we tend to depend upon our planting and our watering rather than on the Lord” (p. 137). Farmers can plow, plant, fertilize, irrigate, cultivate, and harvest, but they can’t control weather or make things grow. So in our spiritual growth, there are things we can and should do, but we can’t make ourselves grow.

We know that apart from Him we can do nothing (John 15:5), yet sometimes we can live an act as if we’re doing it all ourselves. One way we can combat that is through prayer, expressing our dependence on God. Bridges brings up several examples from Psalm 119 of the psalmist’s diligence in studying and attempting to obey God’s word while asking for God’s help and direction and ability. Bridges also points out Nehemiah’s times of protracted prayer as well as spontaneous prayer in the moment of need and points out that we need both kinds of prayer as well.

This was a helpful chapter in many ways. I probably err more on the side of relying on spiritual disciples and need to frequently remind myself my strength and ability comes from God alone, yet there are a few “besetting sins” that I keep waiting for God to take completely away without employing the efforts I need to.

More discussion on this chapter can be found here. My discussions of previous chapters are here.

Book Review: A Wrinkle In Time

I had read A Wrinkle In Time by Madeleine L’Engle as a child, but the only thing I could remember about it was one scene where boys in driveways all down a street were  bouncing balls in perfect rhythm with each other. It was one of those titles I had always wanted to revisit, and I just did so over the last several days via audiobook.

In the time between that first reading and now, I had also heard L’Engle described by some as a Christian fantasy writer in the tradition of C. S. Lewis and by others as a dangerous New Ager. That was another reason I wanted to revisit the book, to see what angle she was coming from. I can definitely see why there is confusion.

The story itself begins with teenager Meg Murry. Meg is finding it hard to fit in at school. Her teachers feel she does not do nearly as well as someone with two brilliant parents should. She doesn’t fit in socially and gets into a fight when someone calls her little brother dumb. She doesn’t like her appearance. And her father has been away for over a year, but no one knows where he is, and some of the townspeople are beginning to gossip about his disappearance.

Meg’s little brother, Charles Wallace, is about five years old and is thought dumb because he does not speak to outsiders, but he is quite articulate with his family. He even seems to go belong the spoken word to know what his family is thinking and what they need, at least his sister and mother. Meg has twin brothers as well, but they seem to be in the background most of the time: by contrast to Meg and Charles Wallace, they are not bad at anything but not exceptionally good at anything either and have no problem “fitting in.”

Meg and Charles Wallace meet a teen-age neighbor, Calvin, and  a Mrs. Whatsit, who, along with Mrs. Who and Mrs. Which, tell the children they are needed not only to save their father but to save their planet from the Black Thing. The three Mrs W’s take the children through time and space via a tesseract (which “wrinkles” time, in a way), to the planet where Meg’s father is being held captive by IT, a being that takes captive the thoughts of the people on the planet and makes everyone act in perfect conformity. A man with red eyes, controlled by IT, tells the children that this is the best way because there is no crime, hate, or sorrow. But the children know better and continue to resist the pull of IT and to to look for Mr. Murry.

I’ll leave the plot there for you to discover. There are recurring themes through the book: good vs. evil, creativity vs. conformity, vigilance vs. passivity, and love vs. hate. Meg continually is reminded that things aren’t always what they appear and she needs patience, and these admonitions are repeated in various ways through the book.

Just as a fantasy or science fiction, the story is quite interesting and well put-together. The differing opinions come in when trying to discern where L’Engle is coming from. It’s interesting that secular sources cite her the book as reflecting her Christian faith, but some Christians have trouble with a few elements. There are definitely Christian elements: Scripture is quoted directly, the whole good vs. evil and love vs. hate themes reflect a Christian base. But Christianity is spoken of more as a philosophy: there is nothing in the actions of the characters that suggest what we’d consider normal Christian life (praying, for instance, even in times of extreme duress). Some of the troubling elements include a “Happy Medium” and Mrs. Which, though not called a witch, described with the typical garb of fairy-tale witches. And when the children are asked who are lights in the world they know of that fight against darkness, they mention Jesus as seemingly just another light beside Shakespeare, Einstein, Bach, Gandhi, and others (I think Buddha may have even been mentioned, but one problem with an audiobook is that I can’t go back and find that exact reference).

I mentioned in a post about magic in Narnia that I had wrestled through the whole issue of magic in books, and came to realize that fairy tale or fictional magic is often not the same thing as the magic the Bible warns against. Real life witches don’t wear pointy hats, ride brooms, or turn people into frogs. I think the magic in this book is more along the lines of fairy tale and not promoting such things in real life. Still, there are serious warnings in the Bible against witches, wizards, and the like, so I don’t know why a Christian writer would use elements known to trouble Christian readers and then scoff at them for being troubled (which L’Engle did in some of the articles I read about her, calling such people “narrow.”) The “Happy Medium,” for instance, uses her crystal ball to show the children the “dark thing” hovering over earth and to show them their families (and the Mrs W’s want her then to look at something pleasant so she’ll stay a happy medium). Since this is science fiction, she could have easily been a scientist with something other that a crystal ball to observe the planets. She is kind of a play on words, though, from earlier in the book when Meg’s mother tells her she needs to find the happy medium (between mindless conformity to fit in with the crowd vs. being so individualistic that she’s peculiar).

In looking through some articles and interviews with L’Engle, I’d say she’s Christianish, but I’d definitely disagree with her on several key points, like universal salvation or viewing the Bible as just stories rather than literal truth. A couple of the interviews I read about her were here and here and here, and of course the Wikpedia entry is here if you’d like to read more about her. I think some of you have read other books by her, and I’d love to hear your insights from her own words.

I didn’t know, when I chose to read this book at this time, that this is the 50th anniversary of its publication, and a new graphic novel of it will be released October 2:

I also didn’t know there was a film made of it, but what little I read and saw of it (clips on YouTube), I don’t think I’d like it. They changed too much of it (as usual). In one of the interviews I read, L’Engle was asked if the film met expectations, and she said, “Yes. I expected it to be bad, and it was.” 🙂

I also gained a lot by skimming through SparkNotes. They pointed out connections and other things I hadn’t caught, like the many references to seeing clearly and people’s glasses, and the fact that Meg’s disappointment that her father couldn’t fix everything when they found him was necessary to her own maturity..

Have you read A Wrinkle In Time or anything else of L’Engle? What do you think?

(This review will also be linked to Semicolon‘s Saturday Review of Books.)

What’s On Your Nightstand: September 2012

What's On Your NightstandThe folks at 5 Minutes For Books host What’s On Your Nightstand? the fourth Tuesday of each month in which we can share about the books we have been reading and/or plan to read.

Here is what I’ve finished since last time (links in this section are to my reviews):

Rare Earth by Davis Bunn. Former operative Marc Royce has been sent into Kenya to help bring supplies to an area devastated by drought and a volcano eruption, but he secretly has another mission. Excellent.

The Bridesmaid by Beverly Lewis, second in the Home to Hickory Hollow series, Amish fiction. Joanna has been a bridesmaid multiple times but finally meets a young man, except he is from another town and obligated to work his father’s farm. Her secret hobby of writing becomes known and gets her in trouble. Always love Beverly Lewis: hers is the only Amish fiction I read.

The Discovery by Dan Walsh. A young author inherits the home of his famous author grandfather and finds an old unpublished manuscript which may reveal things his family never knew. Very good.

The Maid of Fairbourne Hall by Julie Klassen. A well-to-do young women escapes her step-father’s plans for her to wed an unscrupulous young man by disguising herself as a maid and going to another town, ending up at the home of two brothers who were former suitors. A very enjoyable read.

A Wrinkle in Time by Madeline L’Engle, not reviewed yet.

I’m currently reading:

The Disciplines of Grace by Jerry Bridges with Challies‘ “Reading Classics Together” group.

Unless It Moves the Human Heart: The Craft and Art of Writing by Roger Rosenblatt

Thriving at College: Make Great Friends, Keep Your Faith, and Get Ready for the Real World! by Alex Chediak, since my youngest just started college.

When You Come Home: The True Love Story Of A Soldier’s Heroism, His Wife’s Sacrifice and the Resilience of America’s Greatest Generation by Nancy Pitts. This story had been featured in Tom Brokaw’s Greatest Generation, and this is the full story.

Up next:

Uncle Tom’s Cabin for Carrie‘s Book Club October pick, which I happen to be hosting. Join us? I’ve listened through the audiobook but want to go through the book as well.

Full Disclosure by Dee Henderson coming out next week. I’m glad to see a new one from Dee! I really enjoyed her previous books.

Wildflowers of Terezin by Robert Elmer

Audiobooks of C. S. Lewis’s Space Trilogy: Out of the Silent Plant, Perelandra, and That Hideous Strength

What’s on your nightstand? Happy reading!