“The Discipline of Commitment”

After I first became a Christian, when I would become convicted of some sin, I’d make a commitment never to do that again…and of course, fall flat on my face. So I began to think making a commitment was not the way to go about it and was, in fact, setting oneself up for failure. And since it is better not to make a vow than to vow and not fulfill it, I began to just pray that the Lord would help me not to do that particular thing.

But Jerry Bridges makes a compelling argument for making commitments against sin in the chapter “The Discipline of Commitment” in his book The Discipline of Grace. For one thing, in Scripture we see people like Job (“I made a covenant with mine eyes; why then should I think upon a maid?” Job 31:1) and Daniel (“But Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king’s meat, nor with the wine which he drank” Daniel 1:8) do so.

But before we get into making specific commitments against specific sins, we’re called to commit ourselves totally to the Lord. Romans 12:1 says, “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.” Bridges says, “When we commit ourselves to the pursuit of holiness, we need to ensure that our commitment is actually to God, not simply to a holy lifestyle or a set of moral values” (p. 148).

Also, “We should not seek holiness in order to feel good about ourselves, or to blend in with our Christian peer group, or to avoid the sense of shame and guilt that follows the committing of persistent sin in our lives. Far too often our concern with sin arises from how it makes us feel” (p. 149). And we need to guard against being “more vexed at the lowering of our self-esteem than we are grieved at God’s dishonor” (p. 149).

Plus, our commitment should not but just to avoid sin, but to pursue Christlike virtues. Colossians 3:12 says, “Put on therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering.”

Psalm 119:106 says, “I have sworn, and I will perform it, that I will keep thy righteous judgments.” Bridges quotes Stephen Charnock as saying, “Frequently renew settled and holy resolutions. A soldier unresolved to fight may easily be defeated” (p. 151). “If you do not commit yourself to the pursuit of holiness in these specific areas of your life, you will find a tendency to vacillate in the face of these temptations” (p. 159).

Perhaps the hardest thing for me in this chapter was Bridges’ consistent urge to allow no exceptions. “If we do not make such a commitment to obedience without exception, we will find ourselves constantly making exceptions” (p. 153).

But how can we do such a thing? Bridges says one way is by intention. “Is it our intention to please God in all our actions?” (p. 152). He quotes William Law as saying that our lack of holiness often is due to a lack of intention. Law goes on to say, “This doctrine does not suppose that we have no need of divine grace, or that it is in our own power to make ourselves perfect. It only supposes that through the [lack] of a sincere intention of pleasing God in all our actions, we fall into such irregularities of life, as by the ordinary means of grace, we should have power to avoid” (p. 153). Or as I saw quoted somewhere else recently, “Drift is almost always away.” When we don’t have a daily intent to please God in everything, we’re going to find ourselves allowing those things that don’t please Him.

What about grace? Doesn’t this all sound a little legalistic?

“Is God really this strict?” Yes…because he cannot compromise His holiness the least bit. His goal is to conform us to the likeness of His Son, and Jesus was completely without sin, though He was tempted every way we are (Hebrews 4:15). No, we cannot, or perhaps will not, keep these commitments perfectly, but keeping them perfectly should at least be our aim. In a battle, some soldiers will always be hit, but every one of them makes it his aim not to be hit. To have a lesser aim would be the height of folly. (p. 160).

“It was in view of God’s mercy that Paul urged the Romans, and us today, to commit our bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God” (p. 160). Paul had spent the preceding 11 chapters of Romans detailing God’s grace in the gospel. Bridges has several paragraphs, too long to repeat here, bringing out some of the truths of grace from the first part of Romans.

“It is this mercy that is reveled to us in the gospel and that we believers have experienced that is the ground for our commitment. Such a commitment as Paul called for would indeed be a legalistic and oppressive commitment if it were not grounded in love. And the only way Paul would stir up our love is to remind us of God’s love for us, revealed through His mercy and grace. What Paul asked for from us is only a response of love and gratitude, which expresses itself in loving commitment (p. 161).

God provides the grace for the commitment He calls us to (Romans 6:11-14, Hebrews 4:15-16). We need to remind ourselves of the gospel frequently not just to cleanse our consciences, but to reaffirm our commitment to Him as a response of love and gratitude (p. 162-163).

On a personal note…in the course of reading this chapter, I became convicted of a bad driving habit. You wouldn’t think to look at me that I’d be guilty of “road rage,” and as a general rule I am not an angry driver, but when other drivers do something particularly dumb that impacts me, I can get pretty hot under the collar. Just recently I had been stuck behind not one but two different pokey drivers on roads where I couldn’t pass, and I was in danger of being late for church, so when the second one finally turned off the road, I gunned the engine and veered around him before he was totally turned. Then I noticed a car behind me, and hoped it wasn’t someone from church…but it was (and interestingly, after this incident, Bridges shared a very similar one, driving the conviction even deeper.) I always feel guilty about these incidents and think, “I really shouldn’t react that way.” But while reading this chapter I began to feel that I should go further than that. I made a commitment that, God helping me, I would not react in anger while driving for several reasons: It’s dangerous (I could hit someone else while angrily reacting), it is a poor testimony to the driver I’m reacting to as well as anyone watching, and it is not demonstrating the self-control that is a fruit of the Holy Spirit. And, of course, I’ve been tested on this about 3 times since then…but God has used the commitment, or intention, to remind me and help me not to respond in a fleshly way. Bridges urges us to make a general commitment as well as commitments in specific areas….I think if I did that I’d have a very long list to work on, but this is a start.

“The Discipline of Commitment” is the 9th chapter in the book The Discipline of Grace by Jerry Bridges, which we’re discussing every Thursday in the “Reading Classics Together” challenge at Challies‘ place. More discussion on this chapter is here. I had to miss Thursday, but wanted to go through the chapter anyway for my own edification.

Preview of Uncle Tom’s Cabin

Reading to Know - Book Club
I’ve mentioned a number of times that I am hosting Carrie’s “Reading to Know” Book Club for the month of October, and my book choice is Uncle Tom’s Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe. I shared some introductory remarks about the book here at Carrie‘s.

I’d love to have you join us! If you do so, please drop over to Carrie‘s and let her know in this post. It’s not required that one write a review of the book, but Carrie will provide a place to share thoughts about the book and link up to reviews if you’ve written them on October 26.

“Dependent Discipline”

“Dependent Discipline” is the 8th chapter in the book The Discipline of Grace by Jerry Bridges, which we’re discussing every Thursday in the “Reading Classics Together” challenge at Challies‘ place.

Bridges likens dependence and discipline to the two different wings of an airplane, both of which are needed to fly. By discipline here he means not God’s discipline of us, which he discussed in chapter 5, but rather “certain activities designed to train a person in a particular skill”as when Paul told Timothy “to train himself, or discipline himself, to be godly (I Timothy 4:7)” (p. 130).

Now we will be looking at the discipline of ourselves, the responsibilities we must shoulder to pursue holiness. But the point of the airplane illustration is that we must not carry out our responsibilities in our own strength and willpower. We must depend upon the Holy Spirit to enable us. At the same time we must not assume that we have no responsibilities simply because we are dependent. God enables us to work, but He does not do the work for us (p. 130).

Bridges then discusses several Scriptural examples of dependence coupled with work, such as Psalm 127:1, Nehemiah’s rebuilding of the city wall (especially 4:8-9), and Paul’s testimony in Philippians 4:11-13 and Colossians 1:28-29. In that last reference, Paul says he labored, striving (or struggling, depending on the translation), using “a strong [Greek] word, denoting toil to the point of weariness or exhaustion,” the word “agonizomai, from which we get our word agonize, and conveys the idea of an athlete straining to win the race” (p. 133). But he labored “according to his working, which worketh in me mightily,” not in his own strength.

Balance comes up so often in the Bible, and balance is needed here as well. People tend to err by leaning too far one way or the other. In this instance, many advocate the passive approach of “letting Christ live His life through me.” I’ve known some very good people whom I greatly respect who advocate this view, and it never set right with me, because of its passivity as opposed to the action verbs in the gospels and New Testament. Bridges clarified the problems with this approach for me. “He does not live His life through me. Rather, as I depend on Him, He enables me to live a life pleasing to Him” (p. 134). “God’s work does not make our effort unnecessary, but rather makes it effective. Paul did not say, ‘Christ shows contentment through me.’ Rather, he said, ‘I have learned to be content through Him who gives me strength'”(p. 134-135).

The other end of the off-balance spectrum is relying on our spiritual disciplines, necessary as they are, as the source of our spiritual strength rather than on Christ’s strength applied in our lives by the Holy Spirit.

There were times in Old Testament battles when God miraculously gave a victory without Israel having to fight or provided food without any effort of the people involved. But more often than not, He worked through the people going to battle and planting and watering and toiling.

As I Corinthians 3:7 says, planting and watering is needed, but God gives the increase. “The truth is, we must plant and we must water if we are to make progress in holiness, but only the Holy Spirit can change us more and more into the likeness of Jesus. Our problem is that we tend to depend upon our planting and our watering rather than on the Lord” (p. 137). Farmers can plow, plant, fertilize, irrigate, cultivate, and harvest, but they can’t control weather or make things grow. So in our spiritual growth, there are things we can and should do, but we can’t make ourselves grow.

We know that apart from Him we can do nothing (John 15:5), yet sometimes we can live an act as if we’re doing it all ourselves. One way we can combat that is through prayer, expressing our dependence on God. Bridges brings up several examples from Psalm 119 of the psalmist’s diligence in studying and attempting to obey God’s word while asking for God’s help and direction and ability. Bridges also points out Nehemiah’s times of protracted prayer as well as spontaneous prayer in the moment of need and points out that we need both kinds of prayer as well.

This was a helpful chapter in many ways. I probably err more on the side of relying on spiritual disciples and need to frequently remind myself my strength and ability comes from God alone, yet there are a few “besetting sins” that I keep waiting for God to take completely away without employing the efforts I need to.

More discussion on this chapter can be found here. My discussions of previous chapters are here.

Book Review: A Wrinkle In Time

I had read A Wrinkle In Time by Madeleine L’Engle as a child, but the only thing I could remember about it was one scene where boys in driveways all down a street were  bouncing balls in perfect rhythm with each other. It was one of those titles I had always wanted to revisit, and I just did so over the last several days via audiobook.

In the time between that first reading and now, I had also heard L’Engle described by some as a Christian fantasy writer in the tradition of C. S. Lewis and by others as a dangerous New Ager. That was another reason I wanted to revisit the book, to see what angle she was coming from. I can definitely see why there is confusion.

The story itself begins with teenager Meg Murry. Meg is finding it hard to fit in at school. Her teachers feel she does not do nearly as well as someone with two brilliant parents should. She doesn’t fit in socially and gets into a fight when someone calls her little brother dumb. She doesn’t like her appearance. And her father has been away for over a year, but no one knows where he is, and some of the townspeople are beginning to gossip about his disappearance.

Meg’s little brother, Charles Wallace, is about five years old and is thought dumb because he does not speak to outsiders, but he is quite articulate with his family. He even seems to go belong the spoken word to know what his family is thinking and what they need, at least his sister and mother. Meg has twin brothers as well, but they seem to be in the background most of the time: by contrast to Meg and Charles Wallace, they are not bad at anything but not exceptionally good at anything either and have no problem “fitting in.”

Meg and Charles Wallace meet a teen-age neighbor, Calvin, and  a Mrs. Whatsit, who, along with Mrs. Who and Mrs. Which, tell the children they are needed not only to save their father but to save their planet from the Black Thing. The three Mrs W’s take the children through time and space via a tesseract (which “wrinkles” time, in a way), to the planet where Meg’s father is being held captive by IT, a being that takes captive the thoughts of the people on the planet and makes everyone act in perfect conformity. A man with red eyes, controlled by IT, tells the children that this is the best way because there is no crime, hate, or sorrow. But the children know better and continue to resist the pull of IT and to to look for Mr. Murry.

I’ll leave the plot there for you to discover. There are recurring themes through the book: good vs. evil, creativity vs. conformity, vigilance vs. passivity, and love vs. hate. Meg continually is reminded that things aren’t always what they appear and she needs patience, and these admonitions are repeated in various ways through the book.

Just as a fantasy or science fiction, the story is quite interesting and well put-together. The differing opinions come in when trying to discern where L’Engle is coming from. It’s interesting that secular sources cite her the book as reflecting her Christian faith, but some Christians have trouble with a few elements. There are definitely Christian elements: Scripture is quoted directly, the whole good vs. evil and love vs. hate themes reflect a Christian base. But Christianity is spoken of more as a philosophy: there is nothing in the actions of the characters that suggest what we’d consider normal Christian life (praying, for instance, even in times of extreme duress). Some of the troubling elements include a “Happy Medium” and Mrs. Which, though not called a witch, described with the typical garb of fairy-tale witches. And when the children are asked who are lights in the world they know of that fight against darkness, they mention Jesus as seemingly just another light beside Shakespeare, Einstein, Bach, Gandhi, and others (I think Buddha may have even been mentioned, but one problem with an audiobook is that I can’t go back and find that exact reference).

I mentioned in a post about magic in Narnia that I had wrestled through the whole issue of magic in books, and came to realize that fairy tale or fictional magic is often not the same thing as the magic the Bible warns against. Real life witches don’t wear pointy hats, ride brooms, or turn people into frogs. I think the magic in this book is more along the lines of fairy tale and not promoting such things in real life. Still, there are serious warnings in the Bible against witches, wizards, and the like, so I don’t know why a Christian writer would use elements known to trouble Christian readers and then scoff at them for being troubled (which L’Engle did in some of the articles I read about her, calling such people “narrow.”) The “Happy Medium,” for instance, uses her crystal ball to show the children the “dark thing” hovering over earth and to show them their families (and the Mrs W’s want her then to look at something pleasant so she’ll stay a happy medium). Since this is science fiction, she could have easily been a scientist with something other that a crystal ball to observe the planets. She is kind of a play on words, though, from earlier in the book when Meg’s mother tells her she needs to find the happy medium (between mindless conformity to fit in with the crowd vs. being so individualistic that she’s peculiar).

In looking through some articles and interviews with L’Engle, I’d say she’s Christianish, but I’d definitely disagree with her on several key points, like universal salvation or viewing the Bible as just stories rather than literal truth. A couple of the interviews I read about her were here and here and here, and of course the Wikpedia entry is here if you’d like to read more about her. I think some of you have read other books by her, and I’d love to hear your insights from her own words.

I didn’t know, when I chose to read this book at this time, that this is the 50th anniversary of its publication, and a new graphic novel of it will be released October 2:

I also didn’t know there was a film made of it, but what little I read and saw of it (clips on YouTube), I don’t think I’d like it. They changed too much of it (as usual). In one of the interviews I read, L’Engle was asked if the film met expectations, and she said, “Yes. I expected it to be bad, and it was.” 🙂

I also gained a lot by skimming through SparkNotes. They pointed out connections and other things I hadn’t caught, like the many references to seeing clearly and people’s glasses, and the fact that Meg’s disappointment that her father couldn’t fix everything when they found him was necessary to her own maturity..

Have you read A Wrinkle In Time or anything else of L’Engle? What do you think?

(This review will also be linked to Semicolon‘s Saturday Review of Books.)

What’s On Your Nightstand: September 2012

What's On Your NightstandThe folks at 5 Minutes For Books host What’s On Your Nightstand? the fourth Tuesday of each month in which we can share about the books we have been reading and/or plan to read.

Here is what I’ve finished since last time (links in this section are to my reviews):

Rare Earth by Davis Bunn. Former operative Marc Royce has been sent into Kenya to help bring supplies to an area devastated by drought and a volcano eruption, but he secretly has another mission. Excellent.

The Bridesmaid by Beverly Lewis, second in the Home to Hickory Hollow series, Amish fiction. Joanna has been a bridesmaid multiple times but finally meets a young man, except he is from another town and obligated to work his father’s farm. Her secret hobby of writing becomes known and gets her in trouble. Always love Beverly Lewis: hers is the only Amish fiction I read.

The Discovery by Dan Walsh. A young author inherits the home of his famous author grandfather and finds an old unpublished manuscript which may reveal things his family never knew. Very good.

The Maid of Fairbourne Hall by Julie Klassen. A well-to-do young women escapes her step-father’s plans for her to wed an unscrupulous young man by disguising herself as a maid and going to another town, ending up at the home of two brothers who were former suitors. A very enjoyable read.

A Wrinkle in Time by Madeline L’Engle, not reviewed yet.

I’m currently reading:

The Disciplines of Grace by Jerry Bridges with Challies‘ “Reading Classics Together” group.

Unless It Moves the Human Heart: The Craft and Art of Writing by Roger Rosenblatt

Thriving at College: Make Great Friends, Keep Your Faith, and Get Ready for the Real World! by Alex Chediak, since my youngest just started college.

When You Come Home: The True Love Story Of A Soldier’s Heroism, His Wife’s Sacrifice and the Resilience of America’s Greatest Generation by Nancy Pitts. This story had been featured in Tom Brokaw’s Greatest Generation, and this is the full story.

Up next:

Uncle Tom’s Cabin for Carrie‘s Book Club October pick, which I happen to be hosting. Join us? I’ve listened through the audiobook but want to go through the book as well.

Full Disclosure by Dee Henderson coming out next week. I’m glad to see a new one from Dee! I really enjoyed her previous books.

Wildflowers of Terezin by Robert Elmer

Audiobooks of C. S. Lewis’s Space Trilogy: Out of the Silent Plant, Perelandra, and That Hideous Strength

What’s on your nightstand? Happy reading!

Book Review: The Maid of Fairbourne Hall

In The Maid of Fairbourne Hall by Julie Klassen, Margaret Macy is a well-to-do young woman in London whose mother has remarried a man only interested in the family’s wealth. He had thought Mrs. Macy was the one to receive an inheritance, but it is actually Margaret who will come into it on her next birthday. So Margaret’s step-father, Sterling Benton, brings his nephew in to woo Margaret, planning to “manage” their finances after they marry. But Margaret can easily see that Benton’s nephew is no better than he is, and after overhearing their unscrupulous plans, she escapes, hoping to hide out a few months until her next birthday when she comes into independence.

She disguises herself and travels as far away as what little money she has in hand will take her. She finds a hiring fair, hoping to find work as a maid, even though she has never done any such labor in her life. She is hired by a kindly steward and doesn’t learn til they are on their way that the home they are going to is one in which two brothers who had been former suitors of hers live.

Her disguise seems to work, though, and Margaret learns over time that she may have misjudged both the brother she spurned as well as the one she preferred. She also learns much about herself and life “below stairs.”

This was a delightful book. It didn’t take long for me to get hooked and then look for nooks and crannies of time beyond the norm to get a few pages read.

I’ve read books about maids before, but this one incorporated a lot of information that was new to me.

I had seen Julie Klassen’s books but hadn’t yet read one. When this one was free for the Kindle app (at the time, it no longer is), I decided to try it, and now I’ll be looking for Julie’s other books as well!

(This review will also be linked to Semicolon‘s Saturday Review of Books.)

“Obeying the Great Commandment”

“Obeying the Great Commandment” is the seventh chapter in the book The Discipline of Grace by Jerry Bridges, which we’re discussing every Thursday in the “Reading Classics Together” challenge at Challies‘ place.

The Great Commandment Bridges refers to is from Matthew 22:36-40:

“Master, which is the great commandment in the law?”

Jesus said unto him, “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.”

However, love is not just a nice warm feeling. Bridges shares several passage that show that love for God with result in obedience to him, among them these from John 14:

15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.

23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

24a He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings.

For many of us, obedience means fitting in with whatever Christian culture we’re in rather than a whole-hearted purposeful pursuit of learning and doing God’s will. Or we obey with mixed motives — fear of punishment, gift, withholding of blessings, negative consequences, desire to “look good” before others, the feeling that we’ll earn God’s blessing by our deeds, etc. “Without the motive of love, my apparent obedience may be essentially self-serving” (p. 122).

“Fervency of worship on Sunday morning or in our private devotions is vain without an accompanying fervency in obedience to God. On the other hand, precise and exact obedience to the law of God is in vain if it is not prompted by love for Him” (pp. 122-23).

“A person who struggles with some persistent sin but does so out of love for God is more pleasing to Him than the person who has no such struggle but is proud of his or her self-control” (pp. 123-24).

But how do we develop that love for God? “We love him, because he first loved us” (I John 4:19). Our love is a response to His, so meditating on His love for us is the greatest way to increase our love for Him. “To love God, I must believe that He is for me, not against me (Romans 8:1), and that He accepts me as a son or a daughter, not a slave (Galatians 4:7) (p. 125).

Guilt and a sense of condemnation keep us from love, so we need continually cleansed consciences, cleansed by confessing our sin to Him and trusting in His forgiveness, in order to keep that right relationship with Him. His love for us in the gospel is the greatest factor in creating and maintaining our love for Him.

This was perhaps the easiest chapter to understand so far, but it convicted at several points, mainly in having a laid-back rather than a whole-hearted pursuit of obedience and the many wrong motives for obedience.

More discussion on this chapter can be found here. My discussions of previous chapters are here.

Book Review: The Bridesmaid

The Bridesmaid by Beverly Lewis is the second in her Home to Hickory Hollow series, and some characters are in both books, but each can easily be understood alone.

Joanna Kurtz is close to suffering from the old cliche, “Always a bridesmaid, never a bride.” She is 24, which by her community’s standard sets her in danger of being an old maid, and there are no prospects of a suitor in site. But an out-of-town trip for a relative’s funeral leads to a meeting with Eben Troyer, a young Amish man near her age.

The two hit it off immediately, but their relationship is beset my many problems. Besides living in different states and only communicating by letter and an every-other-week phone call, Eben is responsible for helping his father on the farm. The farm would go by rights to his younger brother, Leroy, but Leroy is off “in the world,” getting higher education and learning to fly planes, both taboo to the Amish. All of Eben’s hopes are tied up in Leroy’s coming “back to the fold,” which humanly speaking does not look likely.

Joanna has a semi-secret hobby: she loves to write stories. While not expressly forbidden, it is frowned upon. When news of it reaches the bishop’s ear, he pays a visit to warn her against it. Innocently she asks about the difference between writing stories and telling them, as there are famed Amish story-tellers, but she is threatened with shunning if her impertinence continues. If Joanna is in trouble with her bishop, that would not only affect her own life and her family, but it would likely prevent her from being able to move out of state as well.

Just as these problems  and others for Joanna and Eben come to a head, another young man from Joanna’s community, who seemed undesirable before, begins to show her attention, and she wonders whether God might be leading her toward him.

A relative gives Joanna a quilt stitched by her namesake, and as Joanna learns the story behind the quilt, it inspires her to trust the Lord for her future.

I enjoyed this story and Joanna’s journey. I especially appreciated that in this series, each plot wraps up instead of being held over until the sequel. I always enjoy Beverly’s books. There is something cozy about them, and I admire the industriousness and gentleness of the Amish women. Beverly does not gloss over the problems the Amish face, though, especially the legalism that varies from church to church. I’m looking forward to the next book in the series in April.

(This review will also be linked to Semicolon‘s Saturday Review of Books.)

 

Book Review: The Discovery

In The Discovery by Dan Walsh, famous author Gerard Warner has just passed away. Though well-loved, he was reclusive, not allowing photographs of himself on his book covers, only granting print interviews, never going on book tours. No one knew him like his family, especially his grandson, Michael, who is also an aspiring author.

At the reading of the will, the family members discover that they are each now ridiculously wealthy, and Michael has been willed his grandfather’s beautiful home in Charleston, SC. Michael can begin in earnest now to pursue his own dreams of writing.

In his grandfather’s office Michael discovers a previously unpublished manuscript from his grandfather along with a note indicating that he had intended for Michael to find it. As Michael becomes engrossed in the WWII spy novel, he begins to realize the impact this book will have on his family. And since his grandfather’s manuscript is published as a book within this book, readers can follow along as well.

I can’t say too much more about the plot without spoiling it, and some readers may be able to figure out the main thrust of it just from these few words. But even though I figured things out way before Michael did, this was still a very intriguing read.

My only real criticism of the book is that the spiritual truth in it comes through a character who is a part of what I would consider to be a works-based denomination (though one is not saved by denomination but by personal repentance and faith in Christ). This is the second book in which Walsh has done that. I wouldn’t have a problem with it if this was a secular novel, but in Christian fiction I am dismayed to see such lines blurred.

But overall I really enjoyed the story. Charleston is one of my all-time favorite cities, and I loved the scenes there. The dilemma that Ben, the character in Gerard’s manuscript, finds himself in is heart-wrenching, and  making sacrifices for one you love is displayed on several levels.

(This review will also be linked to Semicolon‘s Saturday Review of Books.)

“Transformed Into His Likeness”

“Transformed Into His Likeness” is the sixth chapter in the book The Discipline of Grace by Jerry Bridges, which we’re discussing every Thursday in the “Reading Classics Together” challenge at Challies‘ place.

When believers are first saved, the penalty for their sin is lifted, having been borne by Christ on the Christ, and His righteousness is put to their account. Yet they still have what the Bible calls their old nature or “old man” within them. Sanctification is the word for the process whereby Christians are gradually transformed from looking and acting like the “old man” to looking and acting more like Christ. It happens in fact at salvation, it happens progressively through life, and it culminates in our perfection when we get to heaven. Or, as Bridges explains it:

Sanctification is the work of the Holy Spirit in us whereby our inner being is progressively changed, freeing us more and more from sinful traits and developing within us over time the virtues of Christlike character. However, though sanctification is the work of the Holy Spirit in us, it does involve our wholehearted obedience and the regular use of spiritual disciplines that are instruments of sanctification (p. 96).

It is “the carrying out of regeneration to its intended end” (p. 99).

You don’t hear this so much these days, but there used to be people who thought that their entire old nature was removed or changed when they became Christians and they could no longer sin. I don’t know how they missed the remaining sinful tendencies in their own hearts or the verses in the Bible that speak of our growth and change.

Today we have more of the opposite problem: people who say they have been regenerated (saved), yet do not display any evidence of a new life or any growth spiritually. Bridges says, “The solution for these people is not to change their conduct so that they might see some evidences of regeneration. The solution is to come to Jesus, renouncing any confidence in their own goodness, confessing themselves to be sinners in the sight of God, and trusting entirely in His atoning work” (p. 98).

After one becomes a Christian, the goal of our transformation is to become more like Christ. “To be like Jesus…is to always seek to do the will of the Father…Not only did Jesus do the will of the Father, not only was that His whole goal in life, but Psalm 40:8 tells us He delighted to do the will of the Father…What is our aim? Is it to please the Father in all we do, or is it just to get through life as comfortably as we can? (p. 102).

But it is not just in our actions and goals that we’re transformed into Jesus’ likeness, but in our character.

This process involves the Holy Spirit’s leading and enabling and our obedience and cooperation.

Our part, that is, our response to the Holy Spirit’s work and our cooperation with Him in His work is the pursuit of holiness…the pursuit of holiness, though requiring diligent effort on our part, is dependent on the enabling power of the Holy Spirit…It is difficult to grasp this principle of being responsible yet dependent. But it is absolutely vital that we grasp and live by it” (p. 100).

In my circles, the idea of progressive sanctification is taught often, but the emphasis tends to be more on our responsibility.  It wasn’t an entirely new thought that Holy Spirit was the agent, the enabler, the One ultimately responsible for our transformation, but I had never heard this truth brought out as thoroughly as Bridges does it, and that was a great blessing to me. Among his comments on this aspect:

Paul said in 2 Corinthians 3:18 that we are being transformed by “the Lord, who is the Spirit.” The verb being transformed is passive, that is, something being done to us, not by us. This does not mean we have no responsibility in sanctification. It means that in the final analysis it is the Spirit of God who transforms us. He calls on us to cooperate and do the part He assigns us to do, but He is the one who works deep within our character to change us (p. 106).

Several passages of Scripture emphasize the fact that sanctification is primarily the work of the Holy Spirit. In 1 Thessalonians 5:23-24 Paul said, “May God himself, the God of peace, sanctify you through and through. May your whole spirit, soul and body be kept blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.The one who calls you is faithful, and he will do it.”…

Again, Paul wrote in Philippians 1:6, “being confident of this, that he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus.”(p. 107).

Finally, the writer of Hebrews prayed that God will “work in us what is pleasing to Him” (Hebrews 13:21) (p. 107).

Yet:

The Spirit of God has indeed given us certain responsibilities in the sanctifying process. In fact, the Bible is filled with exhortations, challenges, and commands to obey, as well as spiritual disciplines to be practiced (p. 107).

I’ve often wondered what exactly is our part and what is His, where does one end and one begin, how does it all work together. Bridges says this is a mystery. It is never quite thoroughly explained in Scripture. But as we do our part, we trust Him for His enabling and transforming.

Bridges then goes on to discuss the various means that the Holy Spirit uses in our sanctification: adversities, exhortations and encouragement from others, Scripture, and prayer. But perhaps the most significant means is found in 2 Corinthians 3:18: “But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory.” “The glory of the Lord denotes the presence of God and all that He is in all of His attributes — His infiniteness, eternalness, holiness, sovereignty, goodness, and so on…God is glorious in all of His being and all of His works” (p. 109). The more we seek Him and gaze on Him in Scripture, the more we are transformed into His likeness.

More discussion on this chapter can be found here. My discussions of previous chapters are here.