Book Review: C. S. Lewis’s Space Trilogy

I’ve gone back and forth with myself about whether to review the books in The Space Trilogy by C. S. Lewis (sometimes called the Ransom Trilogy after the main character) all together or separately. But I think I’ll review them together since there are comments I want to make about the series as a whole, despite the fact that this post may end up somewhat lengthy.

In the first book, Out of the Silent Plant, Professor Ransom is on a walking tour in the English countryside when he runs into an old classmate named Devine. Shortly thereafter he finds himself drugged, kidnapped, and waking up in a moving space ship with Devine and his partner, Weston. In bits and pieces of overheard conversation, he learns that they are intending to hand him over to some creatures known as sorn on a planet called Malacandra, evidently, they all think, for some kind of sacrifice. So naturally at the first possible opportunity on the planet, he runs away, even though he has no idea where to go or how to survive and thinks he will most likely never make it back to Earth.

This foreign planet is nothing like what he thought it would be. He eventually sees another creature that he thinks is a beast until he hears it speak. They begin to communicate by gesture at first and then gradually Ransom, whose specialty is languages, learns that this being is a hross, one of three species, sorn being another and the third, pfifltriggi (I do wonder how Lewis came up with that one), each with different characteristics and talents. These are, at least, the thinking, speaking, reasoning species: there are others who are more animalistic, and then the eldila are invisible except when they appear as light, something like what we would think of as angels. Ransom at first thinks of the planets inhabitants as primitive but soon finds they know and do much more than he would have thought, even having an understanding of astronomy. They call earth Thulcandra, the silent planet, because the Oyarsa (which seems something like an archangel) from that planet is “bent” (their closest term for “bad”) and no longer communicates with the others. When they hear that Ransom’s companions are bent ones, they tell him he needs to see the Oyarsa of Malecandra. As he learns more of their theology, he begins to recognize some elements, though the words describing them are different.

Finally tragedy leads him to seek the Oyarsa and find out why he was sent for in the first place.

In Perelandra, Lewis himself is a character, as he was also at the end of Out of the Silent Planet, Ransom’s friend, colleague, confidante, and the narrator of the story. Ransom and the Oyarsa of Malacandra have kept in contact and Ransom has been asked to go to Perelandra. He is not told why but is willing to help. He discovers a water-based world, meets one green woman who understands the “Old Solar” language he learned on Malacandra, learns that her mate is on the world somewhere and they are the only humanoid inhabitants.  He realizes this world has not yet been touched by sin. But an Unman has arrived to introduce it into this world and Ransom has almost more than he can do to keep what happened to our world from happening to theirs. There is quite a lot of very interesting philosophizing (to put it mildly) between Ransom, the Unman, and the woman. I don’t agree with the way Ransom finally had to deal with the Unman, for reasons which I can’t explain without giving away the plot, but going over that section a second time I did understand better the reasoning for it within the storyline.

That Hideous Strength almost seems unrelated to the series at first, but eventually Ransom and the Oyarsa come into play and we see how the events of the first two books lead to what is going in in this one. This story centers on a young married couple, Mark and Jane Studdock. Mark is a Senior Fellow in sociology at Bracton College in the University of Edgestow, and his penchant for wanting to be included in the inner circle makes him susceptible to being duped and drawn into a dangerous situation which he is blind to. The N.I.C.E. (National Institute for Coordinated Experiments) has come to town: indeed, it is taking over the town under promises of help and improvements. Several of Bracton’s professors are in its employ and they invite Mark into their fold, which he is all too eager to accept. Jane has been having very troubling dreams which prove to be of great interest to a couple of friends in whom she confides. They invite her into an inner circle of their own, on the opposite side of N.I.C.E. Jane is more wary, though, and resists until circumstances compel her to seek their aid and protection. Jane finds that she has not been dreaming per se but seeing visions of actual events.

Thus Mark and Jane end up going different directions, without really communicating to each other about them, and end up on opposite sides in a coming war against good and evil. And another, a greater one, is also being vied for by the two different forces.

These books are sometimes classified as science fiction, but the emphasis is more on the story than the science. I don’t know how much was known about space travel in Lewis’s time, but he was clearly writing an imaginative and speculative story rather than a scientific treatise. Yet the story showcases great theological truth and philosophy.

If you’ve read much of Lewis you may have learned that he felt that the old Greek, Roman, and Norse myths wove together with Christianity, maybe a pre-Christian manifestation (he says in Perelandra, “Ransom at last understood why mythology was what it was – gleams of celestial strength and beauty falling on a jungle of filth and imbecility. His cheeks burned on behalf of our race when he looked on the true Mars and Venus and remembered the follies that have been talked of them on Earth.”)  I don’t think I’d agree with him on that point, but it’s quite interesting how he ties all those elements together here, along with Arthurian legend and the Pendragon, especially in the last book.

I listened to these via audiobooks, and though I enjoy audiobooks and thought this would be a good venue since I had read these books before, it turned out to be a poor choice. The same narrator for all three books had sort of a droning voice which made it hard to listen to and easy to drift from except in the most exciting parts of the story. Unfortunately, some of the most important parts of the philosophizing got lost in the shuffle. But that may have happened no matter what the voice: I think these books’ most valuable sections need to be read and reread and pondered over, which audiobooks don’t allow for (unless one wants to keep hitting ‘rewind.”) I ended up getting the books from the library and looking up certain parts, and reading them was a whole different experience from listening to them. I’d definitely recommend reading these.

Lewis is a master at language, at characterization, and at creating fantasy worlds. At first I would have said this series is not as charming as Narnia, but it does have its own charm, especially in the first two books and felt when Ransom longs to go back to the worlds he has visited.

But Lewis is first and foremost a thinker, and all of these books ponder great truths on the nature of man, the wiles of the evil one, and God’s grace. He also touches on feminism, love, childbirth, false intellectualism, false spirituality (much of that in Perelandra sounds very much like New Ageism of our day), emergent evolution, and much more. These are not cozy bedside fairy tales, especially the last two: these are best read with minds fully engaged.

I can’t close without sharing a couple of favorite quotes. I have more marked in Perelandra than the other two, so I’ll share a few from it.

This first one I loved not for any philosophy behind it but just for the humorous reaction in a conversation between two beings who are new to each other, the Green Lady and Ransom (whom she calls Piebald, for reasons you’ll discover in the book): “And why, O Piebald, are you making little hills and valleys in your forehead and why do you give a little lift of your shoulders? Are these signs of something in your world?”

From one Oyarsa to another about Ransom: “Look on him, beloved, and love him. He is but breathing dust and a careless touch would unmake him. And in his best thoughts there are such things mingled as, if we thought them, our light would perish. But he is in the body of Maleldil [God] and his sins are forgiven.”

When Ransom, before the Oyarsa, realizing the enormity of what he has done to rid the planet of evil, falls to the ground, he is told, “Be comforted. It is no doing of yours. You are not great, though you could have prevented a thing so great that Deep Heaven sees it with amazement. Be comforted, small one, in your smallness. He lays no merit on you. Receive and be glad. Have no fear lest your shoulders be bearing this world. Look! it is beneath your head and carries you.”

Speaking of parts of worlds that God created for His own glory and no man has seen or experienced: “Be comforted, small immortals. You are not the voice that all things utter, nor is there eternal silence in the places where you cannot come.”

David C. Downing has well-written reviews of these books on the C. S. Lewis blog: Out of the Silent Planet: Cosmic Voyage as Spiritual PilgrimagePerelandra: Re-awakening the Spiritual Imagination, and That Hideous Strength: Marriage, Merlin, and Mayhem. He also has what looks like quite an interesting book himself in which Lewis and Tolkien are characters — I might put that on my Christmas wishlist.

Have you read any of the Space Trilogy books? What did you think?

(This review will also be linked to Semicolon‘s Saturday Review of Books.)

Book Review: The Hobbit

I wasn’t originally planning to review The Hobbit by J. R. R. Tolkien. It seems so well known, what could I possibly say that hasn’t already been said? But I couldn’t resist.

I first read it some time after the Lord of the Rings films came out several years ago: The Hobbit comes before those books but I can’t remember if I read it before or after the others. With a new film of The Hobbit coming out in December, I wanted to reacquaint myself with the book before seeing the movie.

Bilbo Baggins is a respectable hobbit who loves food, his home, and his quiet routine. Adventure is frowned on among hobbits and Bilbo has no intention of having any.

But then the wizard Gandalf arrives and coerces an unwitting and unwilling Bilbo into hosting 13 dwarves for a confab. It seems the dwarves want to reclaim their ancient treasure which is being guarded by a dragon, and somehow Gandalf thinks Bilbo is the one to help them. The dwarfs and Bilbo are incredulous at this, but Gandalf insists, “There is a lot more in him than you guess, and a deal more than he has any idea of himself. You may (possibly) all live to thank me yet.”

Thus Bilbo sets off, wishing many times over the course of his quest that he was back home. He encounters elves, trolls, goblins, wolves, giant eagles and a giant spider, a dragon, and a weird creature called Gollum. He obtains a sword and a magic ring. He gets lost alone, he gets captured with others, another time he rescues others, he fights battles, he becomes a peacemaker. Victory in one particular conflict “made a great difference to Mr. Baggins. He felt a different person, and much fiercer and bolder in spite of an empty stomach, as he wiped his sword on the grass and put it back into its sheath. ‘I will give you a name,’ he said to it, ‘and I shall call you Sting.’ ”

I love this kind of story, where a character is called on to do what they don’t think they can, and along the way either develop or learn what they need to know to accomplish it, and they persevere even though they feel stretched beyond their limits. And Middle Earth is a delight. Tolkien provides enough description of the place and creatures to make the reader feel a part of the story but not so much description as to bog a reader down.

I had wondered if the whole Lord of the Rings story arc had been conceived before this book was written, because not much is made of the ring and it doesn’t seem to have the negative effects on its wearer as it does in the later books. According to the Wikipedia entry for The Hobbit, this story was written alone and then sequels were requested. The next three books have a darker tone though they do contain some humorous moments: this book is a little more lighthearted though there are many moments of peril and danger.

There is some debate on whether the book is allegorical or symbolic: Wikipedia and SparkNotes differ on this. It seems to be primarily just a fairy tale, but themes of heroism and bravery, respect for nature, and the dangers of covetousness are clear. A quote I had seen many places before is one I had aways pictured as coming from a merry banquet: “If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.” But it is more of a lament, occurring after a dreadful battle when a character is dying.

I listened to the audiobook version of this book narrated by Rob Inglis, who did a marvelous job with all the voices and even sang rather than recited the songs in the book. His rich timbre and characterizations greatly enhanced the books: he sounds like he could have come straight from the set of the films. I had looked for an unabridged audiobook for a long time: at first all I could find were dramatizations, so I was thrilled to see this.

Here are a couple of trailers for the new film. It looks like they are combining a few elements from the films that were not in The Hobbit (Galadriel wasn’t in this first book), but otherwise they look great and I can’t wait to see the film!

(This review will also be linked to Semicolon‘s Saturday Review of Books.)

Book Review: Wildflowers of Terezin

Steffen Petersen pastors a Lutheran church in 1943 Denmark. He likes safety and predictability and thinks if everyone just lays low and cooperates with the German occupiers, everything will blow over soon.

A bicycle accident lands him in the hospital under the care of Jewish nurse Hanne Abrahamsen who mistakenly thinks he is part of the Danish resistance movement and protects him from the questions of a German officer. Steffen’s brother is a part of the Resistance and comes to take his brother out of the hospital. They have many arguments about the right way to respond to the troubles in their country.

But when Steffen comes face to face with the need to smuggle Jewish citizens out of the country before the Germans whisk them off to camps or worse, he cannot help but aid them.

Hanne is instrumental in aiding them as well but stays behind to help at the hospital. But with an ambitious German officer in charge in the town, can Hanne remain undetected, and can Steffen help her if she is captured?

I first came across Wildflowers of Terezin by Robert Elmer when the Kindle version came up for free. I’ve often said that those free Kindle app books are a great way to try new authors, and this is one case when reading one book through that route led me to exploring the author’s other books and wanting to put many of them on my wish list.

I liked many aspects of this book. I’ve read many WWII-era novels and biographies, but never one set in Denmark as this one is. That added a fresh perspective. The author shares at the end that many of the details and incidents are based on real-life happenings. There is humor sprinkled throughout which counterbalances the grimness of the circumstances. The deepening relationship between Hanne and Steffen, her growing attraction to his Savior, their individual personal growth, the new vibrancy that comes into his own life and ministry, are all unfolded and blended very nicely. There is a sweetness to all of it amidst the danger — not saccharin, not overly done, but the same effect as….finding lovely wildflowers in a prison camp.

(This review will also be linked to Semicolon‘s Saturday Review of Books.)

Book Review: Uncle Tom’s Cabin

Reading to Know - Book Club
Carrie’s “Reading to Know” Book Club pick for the month of October is Uncle Tom’s Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe. If you’ve read this book for this challenge, drop by Carrie’s to let her know, link up your review if you wrote one, and see others’ thoughts.

Uncle Tom’s Cabin is a story on two levels. On one level we trace Tom’s life and the people he encounters through three masters, and we see how he responds to the difficulties he faces by God’s grace. On another level Beecher demonstrates many times over that slaves are real people rather than property and have real souls and real feelings and real family ties and, therefore, slavery is a horrible thing for one person to do to another and for the nation to allow.

The story opens with the news that Tom will have to be sold. His master, Mr. Shelby, is in deep debt, and Tom is so experienced, trustworthy, and valuable that his sale will almost cover the debt. If he doesn’t sell Tom, he will lose all. Though Tom is devastated by the news, especially the thought of leaving his wife and children, he doesn’t run away when he has the chance because he is willing for his sale to help everyone else.

Mr. Shelby’s debt is not quite covered, though, and the slave trader spies a bright and beautiful child that he says will make up the difference. Shelby resists at first, but being over a barrel, feels he has no choice but to give in. The child, Harry, is the son of Eliza, his wife’s personal maid whom she has raised from girlhood. Eliza overhears this news, takes Harry, and runs away.

The story then splits into two, following both Eliza and Tom’s journeys. Eliza’s path leads to Quaker people who endeavor to help slaves escape. Tom’s leads first to a kind master, a Mr. St. Clare. Tom helps save St. Clare’s daughter from drowning while on the ship, and the little girl, Eva, begs her father to buy Tom. St. Clare doesn’t like slavery in itself but feels it’s too big and engrained a problem for one man to combat, so he feels the best he can do is provide a good home for the ones he has, and he also buys those who are in troubling situations, like little Topsy. His Northern cousin, Miss Ophelia, who is visiting, tells him that it is respectable men like him who are doing more harm than good because they lend an air of respectability and acceptance to the practice. But though Ophelia is against slavery, she is blind at first to her own prejudices against black people until her care of Topsy reveals them to her.

St. Clare decides to free Tom so he can be reunited with his wife and children but dies before he can get the legal paperwork done. His wife, Marie, has no problem with slavery or sympathy for slaves and will not honor her husband’s plans. She sells Tom to a cruel master, Simon Legree.

One of the most touching moments in the books for me was when Tom, on the way to Legree’s cabin, starts singing:

Jerusalem, my happy home!
Name ever dear to me;
When shall my sorrows have an end,
Thy joys when shall I see?

The choir of the church my husband and I attended for our first fourteen years of marriage used to sing this song regularly (leaving out some of the more Catholic-sounding verses at the end of the original text as well as about 2/3 of the original verses — I hadn’t realized it was quite so long!), and they used to have a bass solo somewhere in the middle. I always loved it, but when I saw Uncle Tom singing it, setting his hope in heaven while on the way to cruelty in earth, my heart melted, and I couldn’t hear this song afterward without thinking of him.

I understood and appreciated Mrs. Stowe’s desire to show the evils of slavery, both in practice and principle, with good masters or bad, but I hadn’t appreciated how she did this in quite so many layers until I was looking over the SparkNotes for the book, particularly Themes, Motifs, and Symbols section as well as the major character analysis and the analysis of the chapters. I would recommend them to you if you have the time. Just about every character and many of the conversations show by either what is said or what is happening, positively or negatively, plainly or by inference, the various ways in which slavery is wrong and why. Tom’s experience’s, George’s passion, Prue’s self-destruction, Eliza’s fear and bravery, Haley and Loker’s cruelty, St. Clare’s reasoning with himself, Marie’s telling comments, Ophelia’s observations — all of these and so much more help to promote her theme.

She also shows the preeminence of Christianity through Uncle Tom as well as several other characters: Mrs. Bird, the Quakers who help not only runaway slaves but also the injured Loker, Eva, and several others. As I said in my introductory remarks about the book, Tom’s submission is seen these days as a weakness, but it was a submission born of his Christianity, not of weakness or lack of courage and character. Tom has perhaps more character than anyone in the book. The SparkNotes Character Analysis does a great job against this charge as well. As I said before, I was first inspired to read this books years ago when a former pastor whom we highly respected described Tom as “the kind of Christian you always wanted to be.” Tom took seriously Jesus’s admonition to “Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you,” he sought the good of all others, and he refused to compromise his principles even at severe danger to himself.

But even Tom valued freedom. One conversation is as follows:

“Why, Tom, don’t you think, for your part, you’ve been better off than to be free?”
“No, indeed, Mas’r St. Clare,” said Tom, with a flash of energy. “No, indeed!”
“Why, Tom, you couldn’t possibly have earned, by your work, such clothes and such living as I have given you.”
“Knows all that, Mas’r St. Clare; Mas’r’s been too good; but, Mas’r, I’d rather have poor clothes, poor house, poor everything, and have ‘em mine, than have the best, and have ‘em any man’s else – I had so, Mas’r; I think it’s natur, Mas’r.

Some sources say Stowe advocated early feminism by the fact that most of her good, moral characters are women. But I don’t think feminism had anything to do with it. I think she was just showing that women could have great influence. In some cases that’s all they had: I haven’t researched this aspect of those times, but I don’t think they could vote or hold office then, and the husband was very much the lord of the manor. But even so, a woman’s character and influence carried great weight and could be used for great good. Her biggest illustration of that was her own writing of such a book.

Stowe’s writing has its flaws by today’s standards — some characters are too idealized, some passages are wordy, others are preachy, some scenes are a little too melodramatic or sentimental. But she shines in others. Though today we would let a scene speak for itself rather than turn around and appeal to the reader as she does, in some scenes she has a delightful ironic touch, such as in slave trader Haley’s expostulations about how humane he is or Marie St. Clare’s lamentations, and biting sarcasm in others, such as her comments about the man who helped Eliza out of the river: “So spoke this poor, benighted Kentuckian, who had not been instructed in his constitutional relations, and consequently was betrayed into acting in a sort of Christianized manner, which, if he had been better situated and more enlightened, he would not have been left to do.” Her style probably went over better in her day, but the truths she conveyed are timeless.

And it is because those truths — the value of every human life, the Christian way to respond to adversity, the Christian responsibility to live and act in a way that reflects their Savior and to defend the defenseless — that this book is a classic and is still valuable reading even in our day.

(This review will also be linked to Semicolon‘s Saturday Review of Books.)

“The Discipline of Adversity”

“The Discipline of Adversity” is the 13th and final chapter in the book The Discipline of Grace by Jerry Bridges, which we’re discussing every Thursday in the “Reading Classics Together” challenge at Challies‘ place. More discussion on this chapter is here.

though we can only do all of the other disciplines Bridges has discussed with the Holy Spirit’s enabling, yet we still have some responsibility and have to take some initiative. God will speak to us through His Word, but we have to pick it up and read it; He will enable us to keep commitments, but we have to make them, and so on. Bridges reminds us that “we practice these disciplines not to earn favor with God, but because they are the means God has given to enable us to pursue holiness” (p. 228).

But adversity comes from outside of us and is imposed by God on us. It’s not a welcome imposition, but if we remember key factors about it, that will help us endure it.

1. God disciplines those He loves. Hebrews 12:5-6: “And have you forgotten the exhortation that addresses you as sons? ‘My son, do not regard lightly the discipline of the Lord, nor be weary when reproved by him. For the Lord disciplines the one he loves, and chastises every son whom he receives.’”

2. His purpose is our holiness. Hebrews 12:10-11: “For [our fathers] disciplined us for a short time as it seemed best to them, but [God] disciplines us for our good, that we may share his holiness.For the moment all discipline seems painful rather than pleasant, but later it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it.”

3. His purpose is our Christlikeness. Romans 8:28-29a: “And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son.”

We can’t control what happens to us, but we can respond in a right or wrong way.

Wrong ways:

Hebrews 12:5: “My son, do not regard lightly the discipline of the Lord, nor be weary when reproved by him.”

Job 1:22: “In all this Job did not sin or charge God with wrong.” The KJV says “nor charged God foolishly.” Job did not do these things (a good response), but we can be tempted to do them and shouldn’t. Becoming angry with God can lead to a “grudge against God and is actually rebellion” (p. 236).

Right ways:

See God’s hand in it and don’t subscribe it to chance. Lamentations 3:37-38: “Who can speak and have it happen if the Lord has not decreed it? Is it not from the mouth of the Most High that both calamities and good things come?”

Submit to God’s discipline. Hebrews 12:9: “Moreover, we have all had human fathers who disciplined us and we respected them for it. How much more should we submit to the Father of our spirits and live!”

Even knowing all of that, sometimes we wrestle with “Why?” Why does this have to be that way? Why did this have to happen to that person, who is already struggling under so many other things? One of the most helpful sections to me in this chapter besides direct Scripture was this: “Part of the sanctifying process of adversity is its mystery; that is, our inability to make any sense out of a particular hardship” (pp. 233-34). We have to trust that God knows what He is doing, that His ways are higher than ours. “When we are unable to make any sense of our circumstances, we need to come back to the assurance in Hebrews 12:7: ‘God is treating you as sons.’ Remember, He is the one in charge of sanctification in our lives. He knows exactly what and how much adversity will develop more Christlikeness in us and He will not bring, nor allow to come into our lives, any more than is needful for His purpose” (p. 234).

Sometimes people wonder, too, since this is from God, is it wrong to seek relief from it? Not at all. “We can pray earnestly to God for relief and still be submissive to Him in regard to the outcome. Jesus is our supreme example in this as He prayed the night before His crucifixion, “‘My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me. Yet not as I will, but as you will’ (Matthew 26:39) (p. 237).

A few more thoughts that stood out to me:

“Whatever our situation is, it is far better than we deserve. None of us wants to receive from God’s hand what we actually deserve, for that would be only eternal punishment” (p. 242).

“God’s grace is sufficient for us (2 Corinthians 12:9), however difficult and frustrating our circumstances might be…God’s enabling grace will give us the inner spiritual strength we need to bear the pain and endure the hardship, until the time when we see the harvest of righteousness and peace produced by it” (p. 242).

Bridges ends the book with this chapter. It would have been nice to have had a conclusion, a wrapping-up of the whole book beyond the last paragraph or two here.

Overall I have enjoyed my first experience with Challies‘ Reading Classics Together” challenge. I definitely got more out of the book than if I had just read it straight through, because I took it more slowly by reading only a chapter a week, then went through the chapter several times while trying to write a review or sort out my thoughts. That was definitely beneficial to me; I don’t know if it benefited my readers at all. And it helped to draw even more out of the chapter to read some of the thoughts of others participating in the challenge. I don’t know if I will participate again: I guess it depends largely on what books are chosen next. But I enjoyed the experience and than Tim Challies for setting this up for us.

“The Discipline of Watching”

“The Discipline of Watching” is the 12th chapter in the book The Discipline of Grace by Jerry Bridges, which we’re discussing every Thursday in the “Reading Classics Together” challenge at Challies‘ place. More discussion on this chapter is here.

The epigraph for this chapter is Matthew 26:41: “Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation. The spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.” Just as the Titanic sank because its captain and crew ignored warnings and didn’t employ methods at hand for watching out for icebergs, so we can fall into temptation if we’re not watchful and if we don’t employ the tools God gave us for that purpose.

The first step in watchfulness is knowing our enemies: the world, the flesh, and the devil. Each has unique ways of attempting to lure one into sin.

Probably most of us have the most trouble with the “flesh,” our old nature. Bridges quotes Sinclair Ferguson as saying, “Freedom from the dominion of sin is not…the same thing as freedom from its presence and influence. Indeed, the power of sin remains where the dominion has been banished, and though that power of sin be weakened, yet its nature is not changed” (p. 212). We’re saved from the dominion of sin when we become Christians, but we won’t be totally free from its presence until we get to heaven, so we must be on guard against its influence and pulls. “Our flesh is always searching out opportunities to gratify itself according to the particular sinful desires each of us has” (p. 213-214). Though we can be tempted by most anything, each of us has certain sins we’re more inclined to. Jim Berg, in his book Changed Into His Image, calls them “designer sins.”

We need to know our particular weaknesses in order to watch out for our particular temptations. But we need to be careful of our strengths, too, “because that is where we are apt to trust ourselves and not depend on God” (p. 217). We need to be careful not to let “little” sins slide, because they can snowball into bigger problems before we know it.

All this talk of watchfulness might cause some to wonder, “What about Christian liberty?” Paul urges us not to”turn our freedom into an opportunity for the flesh” (Galatians 5:13). We can’t make up a Pharisaical list of don’ts (we can too easily judge our spirituality and everyone else’s by our “lists”), but we need to know that our heart is desperately wicked and will look for excuses to follow its own way. Some helpful guidelines to keep ourselves in check are:

“All things are lawful for me,” but not all things are helpful. “All things are lawful for me,” but I will not be enslaved by anything.  I Corinthians 6:12.

All things are lawful, but not all things are profitable. All things are lawful, but not all things edify. Let no one seek his own good, but that of his neighbor. (I Corinthians 10:23-24).

“The best defense is a good offense,” as the old saying goes, and “the best offense is meditation on the Word of God and prayer. It is surely no coincidence that they are the only two spiritual exercises that we are encouraged to do continually” (p. 223). “For every temptation that you face, there are specific passages of Scripture that address that issue” (p. 223). We can seek some out, perhaps asking the help of another mature Christian if we don’t know where to look, and then “memorize those verses, meditate on them, and pray over them every day, asking the Holy Spirit to bring them to your mind in times of need. Ask, also, that He will strengthen your will to enable you to obey the word that He brings to your mind” (p. 223). And we can pray, as Jesus instructed His disciples, that God would “lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one” (Matthew 6:13).

Even with all of that, we sin every day, and we need God’s grace for forgiveness. “The gospel of God’s forgiveness of our sins through Christ’s death frees us to face those sins honestly and bring them to the cross and Jesus’ cleansing blood. The freedom and joy that then come from a cleansed conscience create the desire and give us the right motive to deal with those sins. We cannot effectively pursue holiness without going back again and again to the gospel” (p. 225).

And even though Bridges doesn’t say this directly, it’s implied through the whole chapter that grace doesn’t negate the need for watchfulness. That we can be forgiven for sins doesn’t mean we should not make every attempt to avoid them. Jesus said to “watch and pray” and to pray that we wouldn’t be led into temptation, Paul told readers to “flee youthful lusts,” to do and not to do certain things. We can’t be presumptuous and negligent, thinking that it doesn’t matter if we sin because God will forgive us. Psalm 19:13 even contains the prayer, “Keep back thy servant also from presumptuous sins; let them not have dominion over me.” But, thank God, when we do fail we can experience His grace and forgiveness.

What’s On Your Nightstand: October 2012

What's On Your NightstandThe folks at 5 Minutes For Books host What’s On Your Nightstand? the fourth Tuesday of each month in which we can share about the books we have been reading and/or plan to read.

Here is what I’ve finished since last time:

Full Disclosure by Dee Henderson, reviewed here. Liked it a lot.

When You Come Home: The True Love Story Of A Soldier’s Heroism, His Wife’s Sacrifice and the Resilience of America’s Greatest Generation by Nancy Pitts, not reviewed. This story had been featured in Tom Brokaw’s Greatest Generation, and this is the full story.

Audiobooks of C. S. Lewis’s Space Trilogy: Out of the Silent Plant, Perelandra, and just finished That Hideous Strength yesterday afternoon.  I’m planning to review them all together  — unless that ends up being too long a post.

I had finished A Wrinkle in Time last time but hadn’t reviewed it yet: that review is here if anyone is interested. I’d appreciate the input of anyone who has read more of her than I have: I’m still not quite sure what to think of her.

I’m currently reading:

The Disciplines of Grace by Jerry Bridges with Challies‘ “Reading Classics Together” group. Only two chapters left!

Unless It Moves the Human Heart: The Craft and Art of Writing by Roger Rosenblatt (ought to move this one to TBR since I haven’t progressed much past the first few pages)

Thriving at College: Make Great Friends, Keep Your Faith, and Get Ready for the Real World! by Alex Chediak. Almost done! This one has been on here a while.

Uncle Tom’s Cabin for Carrie‘s Book Club October pick

Wildflowers of Terezin by Robert Elmer

Up next:

The Christian Imagination by Leland Ryken

The Last Superhero by Stephen Altrogge. I’ve never read anything by Altrogge, but it was free for the Kindle app, so a good time to try it, yes?

Allerednic: A Regency Cinderella Tale–In Reverse by Chautona Havig, another free one (great way to try new authors!) And my friend Lou Ann liked this, which bodes well for it.

Next audiobook: Probably The Hobbit. I want to go through it before the film comes out in December.

Happy Reading!

“The Discipline of Choices”

“The Discipline of Choices” is the 11th chapter in the book The Discipline of Grace by Jerry Bridges, which we’re discussing every Thursday in the “Reading Classics Together” challenge at Challies‘ place. More discussion on this chapter is here.

This was a hard chapter for me. Not hard to understand so much, but hard to come to grips with. As “spiritual” as it sounds to want to fight sin by “giving it all to God” or asking Him to take it, what it comes down to is my choice. I can’t make the right choices without Him, but I have to yield either to righteousness or unrighteousness. But it was also a helpful and hopeful chapter.

I’m not going to outline or summarize the chapter this time, but I will just share a few key points that stood out to me:

“We obey one choice at a time” (p. 191). That was a major relief to me. Looking at a lifetime of fighting sinful tendencies sounds exhausting, but I only have to focus on one choice at a time.

Whichever way we yield ourselves, we’re training and developing our character either further in righteousness or further in sin.

We might agree with what the Bible says about a certain sin, “and even make a commitment of sorts to put it out of our lives…..We would like to be rid of that sin, and even pray to God to take it away, but are we willing to say no to it?” (p. 194).

Most of us have at least a couple of areas we struggle with, have made commitments about, memorized applicable verses about. “We need to be especially vigilant in these areas to make the right choices. We have already made too many wrong choices; that is why these sin patterns are so deeply entrenched in us. It is only through making the right choice to obey God’s Word that we will break the habits of sin and develop the habits of holiness. This is where we desperately need the power of the Holy Spirit to enable us to make the right choices. So cry out to God every day for His help that day, and then cry out again each time you are confronted with the choice to sin or to obey” (p. 194).

There were several standout statements about “mortification” from Romans 8:13: “For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.”

“Mortification, or putting sin to death, is our responsibility. Paul said, ‘You put sin to death’ (emphasis added). This is something we must do. It is not something we turn over to God. Rather, it is our responsibility, as Paul also emphasized in Colossians 3:5” (p. 196).

“Although mortification is our responsibility, it can only be done through the enabling power of the Holy Spirit. Paul said, ‘But if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will live’ (emphasis added)” (p. 196).

“To mortify a sin means to subdue it, to deprive it of its power, to break the habit pattern we have developed of continually giving in to the temptation of that particular sin. The goal of mortification is to weaken the habits of sin so that we do make the right choices” (p. 197).

“To mortify sin we must focus on its true nature. So often we are troubled with a persistent sin only because it disturbs our peace and makes us feel guilty. We need to focus on it as an act of rebellion against God” (p. 198).

After explaining that the word for “mortify” is used several times in the NT of putting someone to death in the context of hostility (as when Jesus was put to death), Bridges says, “Now apply that sense of hostility toward the sin you wish to mortify. See it for what it is and what it stands for — a rebellion against God, a breaking of His law, a despising of His authority, a grieving of His heart. This is where mortification actually begins, with a right attitude toward sin. It begins with the realization that sin is wrong, not because of what it does to me, or my spouse, or child, or neighbor, but because it is an act of rebellion against the infinitely holy and majestic God who sent His Son to be the propitiation for my sins” (p. 199).

“Think of an unusually persistent sin in your life…You say you cannot overcome it. Why not? Is it because you exalt your secret desire above the will of God?” (p. 199).

Just as in past chapters Bridges has emphasized that the pursuit of holiness is not just against sin but towards Christ-likeness, so he applies that truth here as well. Our choices are not just to avoid certain temptations but to grow in holiness.

“Just as it is ‘by the Spirit’ that we put to death the misdeeds of the body, so it is by the Spirit that we put on the virtues of Christlike character. That is why Paul could say in Colossians 3:12-14 that we are to clothe ourselves with these qualities (emphasizing our responsibility), while in Galatians 5:22-23 he refers to Christian character traits as the ‘fruit of the Spirit’ (emphasizing our dependence on the Spirit). The same Spirit who enables us to mortify sin also enables us to put on godly character” (p. 203).

“There is a fine line between using grace as an excuse for sin and using grace as a remedy for our sin,” but we do need to understand that we will often fail, especially when fighting long-held and deeply engrained habits, and to remember “that we stand before God on the basis of His grace rather than our performance.” (p. 204).

“The solution to staying on the right side of the fine line between using and abusing grace is repentance. The road to repentance is godly sorrow (2 Corinthians 7:10). Godly sorrow is developed when we focus on the true nature of sin as an offense against God rather than something that makes us feel guilty….Dwelling on the true nature of sin leads us to godly sorrow, which in turn leads us to repentance” (p. 205).

Book Review: Full Disclosure

Some years back, my mom’s Christianity was uncertain but she didn’t want to talk about it. But I discovered she would read Christian fiction, so I sought to find the kinds of stories she would like. I wasn’t into action/suspense/mystery books so much, but she liked them. so I looked for that kind of book within Christian fiction, and that’s how I found Dee Henderson. Though I started reading them to pass on to my mom, I quickly became enthralled myself, and devoured all of the O’Malley series as well as the Uncommon Heroes series.

Dee hasn’t had anything new out for 5 or 6 years, so when I saw that  Full Disclosure was due out, I quickly preordered it. And I think she has another winner here.

FBI Special Agent Paul Falconer has been on the trail of one case for years: a lady shooter responsible for thirty murders. One day Ann Silver, the Midwest Homicide Investigator, shows up in his office unexpectedly with a lead on the case.

Though the two are mutually attracted, this isn’t a typical romance. Ann is content to be single, not looking to be married, and isn’t sure whether her past or her secrets would allow for marriage. Since Paul is an investigator, he seeks information about Ann before approaching her directly. He is in line to become the head of the Falcon family and its extensive businesses and industries, and his responsibilities, their different locations, activities, job stresses, and personalities, all make a relationship questionable, but he is ready to try. Now he just has to convince Ann, and she has to decide whether she can fully disclose her secrets to him.

Meanwhile there is unexpected and surprising progress on the lady shooter case as well as unexpected development in a case Ann is writing a book about.

I love the several layers to the title, Full Disclosure: one aspect involves Ann, and both cases are progressively disclosed as well. I liked that this was an older person’s thoughtful romance without silly swooning. I liked the realistic way they had to come to terms with their differences, both having to adjust, and the way their Christianity was natural and impacted everything they did. And there is quite a big “Wow, I didn’t see that coming” moment near the end of the book. I think I may have gasped out loud when I came to it.

It has been a long time since I read Dee’s other books, so it took me a while to recognize that some of her other characters are here as well, but it was fun to do so. Small spoiler here: one unexpected twist is that Ann is portrayed as the writer of the O’Malley and Uncommon Heroes books. I wasn’t sure how I felt about that at first, but it was kind of neat to have the stories within a story. And the fact that Ann wrote books based on her friends’ lives but keeps a low profile herself, and the fact that Dee seems to keep a low profile as well has me hmmming, wondering if Ann really “is” Dee or if the similarities are just for fun.

There is an interview with Dee here. I give Full Disclosure two thumbs up and five stars.

The Discipline of Convictions

Contrary to the postmodern belief that there is no absolute truth, the Bible discloses much absolute truth, and it is incumbent upon believers to know it both so that we worship God “in spirit and in truth,” and so that our behavior reflects our beliefs. Otherwise our morality is determined by consensus, by what everyone else is doing. Even Christians fall too easily into that trap, of adapting their lives to their particular Christian culture rather than on Bible-based convictions.

Jerry Bridges, in The Discipline of Grace, defines conviction as “a determinative belief: something you believe so strongly that it affects the way you live. Someone has observed that a belief is what you hold, but a conviction is what holds you” (p. 167).

God tells us “do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God” (Romans 12:2). Renewing our minds comes about as we read God’s Word, delight in it, meditate on it, and thereby derive convictions from it. “One who delights in the Law of God sees the Bible not just as a book of rules that are difficult to live by, but as the Word of his or her heavenly Father who is the God of all grace and deals with him or her in grace” (p. 169).

Without regular time reading and studying the Bible, our beliefs and morality will be influenced by the ungodly. Psalm 1 contrasts the righteous with the ungodly.

If we do not actively seek to come under the influence of God’s Word, we will come under the influence of sinful society around us. The impact of our culture with its heavy emphasis on materialism, living for one’s self, and instant gratification is simply too strong and pervasive for us not to be influenced by it. Once again, there is no such thing as a neutral stance on the continuum of influence. We are being drawn more and more under the transforming influence of Scripture, or we are being progressively drawn into the web of an ungodly society around us (p. 171).

But as we approach the Scriptures, we need to do so with the conviction that it is the Word of God, asking God to teach us its truths rather than just looking to shore up our own opinions, and we need to seek to apply it to our lives, not just store up knowledge and facts.

Our acceptance by God the Father is based solely on His grace to us through Christ. His favor is never earned by what we do nor forfeited by what we don’t do. But we may say with equal emphasis that our progress in the pursuit of holiness is to a significant degree conditioned on our use of the disciplines that God has appointed for us (p. 184).

Bridges mostly discusses how developing Bible-based convictions will keep us from veering off into ungodly thoughts and behaviors, but it will also help us not to veer into Christian lines of thought that are off-base or off-balance. Sometimes Christians can get hold of one aspect of truth without its balance of another, or take a Bible-based conviction and extrapolate from that certain standards of behavior that aren’t Biblically based at all, and defend those convictions with as much or more vigor than the clear teaching of Scripture. That can do great harm to the cause of Christ and the testimonies of believers. We desperately need to form convictions based on Scripture itself.

“The Discipline of Commitment” is the 10th chapter in the book The Discipline of Grace by Jerry Bridges, which we’re discussing every Thursday in the “Reading Classics Together” challenge at Challies‘ place. More discussion on this chapter is here.